Questions about proof of theorem

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of a theorem regarding subharmonic functions in a domain $\Omega$ that satisfies the exterior sphere condition at a boundary point $x_0$. The theorem states that if $u(x) = \sup_{v \in F_{\phi}} v(x)$, then $\lim_{x \to x_0} u(x) = \phi(x_0)$. A key part of the proof involves establishing a constant $C$ such that $Ch(x) > 2M$ for $|x - x_0| \geq \delta$, where $M = \sup \phi$. The discussion also addresses the harmonicity of the function $h(x)$ and the inequalities necessary for the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of subharmonic functions and their properties.
  • Familiarity with the exterior sphere condition in geometric analysis.
  • Knowledge of harmonic functions and the Laplace operator.
  • Basic concepts of limits and continuity in mathematical analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of subharmonic functions in detail.
  • Learn about the exterior sphere condition and its implications in geometric analysis.
  • Explore harmonic functions and their relationship with subharmonic functions.
  • Investigate the proof techniques used in theorems involving limits and continuity.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in analysis and partial differential equations, as well as graduate students studying geometric analysis and the properties of harmonic and subharmonic functions.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

We say that the space $\Omega$ satisfies the exterior sphere condition at the point $x_0 \in \partial{\Omega}$ if there is a $y \notin \overline{\Omega}$ and a number $R>0$ such that $\overline{\Omega} \cap \overline{B_y(R)}=\{ x_0 \}$.

Let the function $\phi \in C^0(\partial{\Omega})$. Let $F_{\phi}$ the set that contains the " under functions of $\phi$ in $\Omega$ ", i.e. the functions $v \in C^0(\overline{\Omega})$ that are subharmonic in $\Omega$ and in $\partial{\Omega}$ it holds that $v|_{\partial{\Omega}} \leq \phi$. (We say that the function $v$ is subharmonic in $\Omega$ if for each ball $B \subset \Omega$ it holds that $v \leq H_B[v]$, where $H_B[v](x)=\left\{\begin{matrix}
\text{ harmonic for } x \in B \\
v(x) \text{ for } x \in \Omega \setminus{B}
\end{matrix}\right.$)
Theorem: If $u(x)=\sup_{v \in F_{\phi}} v(x)$ and at the point $x_0$ the space $\Omega$ satisfies the exterior sphere condition, then $\lim_{x \to x_0} u(x)=\phi(x_0), x \in \Omega$.

Proof: Let $n \geq 3$. We define the function $h(x)=\frac{1}{R^{n-2}}-\frac{1}{|x-y|^{n-2}}$.

Obviously $h(x_0)=0$ and $h(x)>0$ in $\overline{\Omega} \setminus{\{ x_0\}}$. Since $\phi$ is continuous we have that $\forall \epsilon>0 \ \exists \delta>0$ such that

$|\phi(x)-\phi(x_0)|< \epsilon$ for $|x-x_0|< \delta$.

Also there is a constant $C>0$ such that $Ch(x)>2M$ for $|x-x_0| \geq \delta$ since $h(x)>0$ in $\overline{\Omega} \setminus{ \{ x_0 \}}$, here $M=\sup \phi$.

  • Could you explain to me why there is a $C$ such that $Ch(x)>2M$ ?

In order to prove the theorem it suffices to show that $|u(x)-\phi(x_0)| \leq \epsilon+ Ch(x)$ since $Ch(x) \to 0$ while $x \to x_0$.

So we want the folllowing inequality to hold.

$\phi(x_0)-\epsilon-Ch(x) \leq u(x) \leq \phi(x_0)+ \epsilon+ Ch(x), \forall x \in \Omega$The first inequality follows from the fact that $\phi(x_0)- \epsilon-Ch(x) $ is an under function.
Indeed, this function is harmonic and so also subharmonic and $\phi(x_0)-\epsilon-C h(x)|_{\partial{\Omega}} \leq \phi(x), \forall x \in \partial{\Omega}$.

  • I tried to show that the function is harmonic, but I got that $\Delta h=2(n-2) \frac{n-2(n-3) |x-y|}{|x-y|^{n-3}}$. Have I done something wrong? Also how do we get the inequality?
    Don't we have for $|x-x_0| \leq \delta$ that $\phi(x_0)- \epsilon> \phi(x)$ ? Or am I wrong? (Sweating)
The second inequality holds since $\phi(x_0)+ \epsilon+C h(x)$ is harmonic and $u|_{\partial{\Omega}} \leq \sup \phi \leq \phi(x_0)+ Ch(x)|_{\partial{\Omega}}$.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Also there is a constant $C>0$ such that $Ch(x)>2M$ for $|x-x_0| \geq \delta$ since $h(x)>0$ in $\overline{\Omega} \setminus{ \{ x_0 \}}$, here $M=\sup \phi$.

  • Could you explain to me why there is a $C$ such that $Ch(x)>2M$ ?

Hey evinda! (Smile)

Can't we pick for instance:
$$C = \frac{2M + 1}{\inf_{\xi \in\overline{\Omega} \setminus{ \{ x_0 \}}} h(\xi)}$$
(Wondering)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K