greetings . i have a couple of questions about the prime counting function .(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

when [itex]\pi _{0}(x)[/itex] changes by 1, then it's logical to assume that it should happen at a prime argument . meaning :

[tex]\lim_{\xi\rightarrow 0}\pi _{0}(x+\xi )-\pi _{0}(x-\xi )=1 [/tex]

implies that x is a prime .

is this a true assumption ?

according to the literature, we can expand [itex] \pi_{0}(x)[/itex] using the riemann R function .

[tex] R(x) = 1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{(ln x)^{k}}{k!k\zeta (k+1)}[/tex]

[tex] \pi_{0}(x)= R(x)-\sum_{\rho} R(x^{\rho })-\frac{1}{lnx}-\frac{1}{\pi}tan^{-1}\left( \frac{\pi}{lnx}\right) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{(lnx)^{k}[1-\sum \rho^{k} ]}{k!k\zeta(k+1)}-\frac{1}{lnx}-\frac{1}{\pi}tan^{-1}\left( \frac{\pi}{lnx}\right) [/tex][itex] \rho [/itex] being the nontrivial zeros of the zeta function .

is this correct !?!? i mean , is the expansion correct !?!?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Questions about the prime counting function

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**