Questions on Basic Axioms for Calculating Probabilities

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nacho-man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the axiom of σ-additivity in probability theory, specifically regarding the calculation of probabilities for nested events defined as $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$. Participants clarify that while the sets $A_n$ are not disjoint, they can be expressed as a union of disjoint sets $B_n = A_n \setminus \bigcup_{k=1}^{n-1} A_k$. This transformation allows for the use of σ-additivity to compute the probability of the union of these sets, leading to the conclusion that $P(A) = \lim_{n\to\infty} P(A_n)$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts, including σ-additivity.
  • Familiarity with nested sets in probability theory.
  • Knowledge of set operations, particularly unions and differences.
  • Ability to work with limits in mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of σ-additivity in probability theory.
  • Learn about the construction of disjoint sets from nested sets.
  • Explore the implications of the Borel-Cantelli Lemma in probability.
  • Investigate examples of nested events and their probability calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying probability theory, statisticians, and anyone interested in advanced probability concepts and their applications.

nacho-man
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Please refer to the attached image.

for problem 1a)
i can see how this makes intuitive sense, however the hint confuses me.

When we are told that $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ why would the hint say to attempt to express $A$ as as a union of countably many disjoint sets, when it is defined not to be disjoint in the question?

$P(A) = P(A_1) + ... + P(A_n)$ as $n$ approaches $\infty$
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    27.8 KB · Views: 106
Physics news on Phys.org
nacho said:
Please refer to the attached image.

for problem 1a)
i can see how this makes intuitive sense, however the hint confuses me.

When we are told that $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ why would the hint say to attempt to express $A$ as as a union of countably many disjoint sets, when it is defined not to be disjoint in the question?

$P(A) = P(A_1) + ... + P(A_n)$ as $n$ approaches $\infty$
If $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ then $\cup_{n=1}^{N} A_{n} = A_{N}$ and that means that the sets $A_{n}$ aren't disjoint...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
yes, but the question says to "Express $A$ as a union of countably many disjoint sets".

i don't understand why though.
 
nacho said:
yes, but the question says to "Express $A$ as a union of countably many disjoint sets".

i don't understand why though.

I also don't understand (Emo) ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
nacho said:
When we are told that $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ why would the hint say to attempt to express $A$ as as a union of countably many disjoint sets, when it is defined not to be disjoint in the question?
The hint says so because for disjoint sets you can apply the axiom of σ-additivity. Yes,$A_n$ are not disjoint, so you have to define sets that are. Consider $B_n=A_n\setminus\bigcup_{k=1}^{n-1}A_k$. Then $B_n$ are mutually disjoint, $A_n=\bigcup_{k=1}^{n}B_k$ and $\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n$. Using these properties and σ-additivity, complete the following equality.

\[
P(A)=P(\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n)= \dots=\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{k=1}^n P(B_k) =\dots=\lim_{n\to\infty}P(A_n)
\]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K