MHB Questions on Basic Axioms for Calculating Probabilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter nacho-man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms
nacho-man
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Please refer to the attached image.

for problem 1a)
i can see how this makes intuitive sense, however the hint confuses me.

When we are told that $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ why would the hint say to attempt to express $A$ as as a union of countably many disjoint sets, when it is defined not to be disjoint in the question?

$P(A) = P(A_1) + ... + P(A_n)$ as $n$ approaches $\infty$
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    27.8 KB · Views: 92
Physics news on Phys.org
nacho said:
Please refer to the attached image.

for problem 1a)
i can see how this makes intuitive sense, however the hint confuses me.

When we are told that $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ why would the hint say to attempt to express $A$ as as a union of countably many disjoint sets, when it is defined not to be disjoint in the question?

$P(A) = P(A_1) + ... + P(A_n)$ as $n$ approaches $\infty$
If $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ then $\cup_{n=1}^{N} A_{n} = A_{N}$ and that means that the sets $A_{n}$ aren't disjoint...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
yes, but the question says to "Express $A$ as a union of countably many disjoint sets".

i don't understand why though.
 
nacho said:
yes, but the question says to "Express $A$ as a union of countably many disjoint sets".

i don't understand why though.

I also don't understand (Emo) ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
nacho said:
When we are told that $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ why would the hint say to attempt to express $A$ as as a union of countably many disjoint sets, when it is defined not to be disjoint in the question?
The hint says so because for disjoint sets you can apply the axiom of σ-additivity. Yes,$A_n$ are not disjoint, so you have to define sets that are. Consider $B_n=A_n\setminus\bigcup_{k=1}^{n-1}A_k$. Then $B_n$ are mutually disjoint, $A_n=\bigcup_{k=1}^{n}B_k$ and $\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n=\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty B_n$. Using these properties and σ-additivity, complete the following equality.

\[
P(A)=P(\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n)= \dots=\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{k=1}^n P(B_k) =\dots=\lim_{n\to\infty}P(A_n)
\]
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top