Quite a tricky gear ratio question to ponder

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the gear ratios for a theoretical 6-speed gearbox, given a first gear ratio of 7:1 and a sixth gear ratio of 1:1. Participants explore various methods to derive the intermediate gear ratios, questioning the applicability of geometric progression and discussing the implications of different gear train types.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using geometric progression to calculate the intermediate gear ratios but finds it does not yield satisfactory results.
  • Another participant argues that there is no standard linear progression in gear ratios, as they are typically chosen by manufacturers for specific performance characteristics.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the importance of maintaining the engine's power band across different speeds, suggesting that the design of gear ratios may vary based on application (e.g., drag racing vs. highway cruising).
  • One participant proposes a method involving RPM measurements at each gear to derive the ratios, contingent on the gearbox having a compound gear train.
  • Another participant expresses frustration over the lack of information regarding the type of gear train, suggesting that assumptions about speed are insufficient for a complete analysis.
  • One participant mentions a friend's calculation of a progressive increment of 1.4 for the gear ratios, seeking clarification on how this was derived.
  • Another participant critiques the approach of dividing the first gear ratio by the number of gears to distribute ratios uniformly, suggesting an arithmetic progression instead of a geometric one.
  • One participant shares specific percentage changes between gears based on a dirt bike's performance, indicating a practical application of gear ratios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the methods for calculating gear ratios, with no consensus on the best approach. Some advocate for geometric progression, while others argue for different mathematical models or emphasize the importance of the gearbox design.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of a defined gear train type and the absence of specific speed measurements, which are necessary for accurate calculations. The discussion also highlights the variability in gear ratio design based on application and performance needs.

crabbies2011
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If a 6 speed gear box has a 1st gear ratio of 7:1 and a sixth gear ratio of 1:1
how would you calculate the 2nd,3rd,4th and 5th gear ratio's?

If you use the equation for geometric progression which was my first thought - it doesn't work!

Any ideas?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Crabbies.
It can't be done in the way that you seem to want. There isn't usually any standard linear progression from one gear to the next. Each is chosen by the manufacturer for a specific reason.
If you want an example that will really blow your mind, the A-833 in my Roadrunner is squirrelly. Pulling it into the 3rd gear gate actually puts it into 4th, which is 1:1. An upshift to the 4th gate drops it back into 3rd, which is a .73:1 overdrive. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
ha that is odd!

My example won't be actually built it is the theory behind it that i was after. I need to find a way of calculating those values whether they are linear or not.
 
Ahhh... different matter entirely. I thought that you were trying to figure out the intermediates in an existing product.
There are a few guys here who can give you much better advice than I can in regard to specifics. Generally, though, you want to achieve certain things in each range. I'm making what I think is a reasonable assumption in thinking of this as an internal-combustion vehicle application. I don't like to assume, but this is pretty much the only situation I'm aware of, other than lathes and other machine tools, wherein shiftable trannies are used.
The goal in such devices is to keep the engine as close as possible to the middle of its power band regardless of vehicle speed. That is modified by what you want to achieve. Drag racing requires narrow-band shifting, whereas a highway cruiser is more open. Special situations such as tractor-trailer units have to combine aspects of both, but they're usually diesels and thus have a more restricted rpm range.
 
crabbies2011 said:
If you use the equation for geometric progression which was my first thought - it doesn't work!

Why do you think that? My calculator says 1.00, 1.48, 2.18, 3.21, 4.74, 7.00.
 
Most transmissions are 1:1 in 4th gear but some 6 speeds are 1:1 in 5th gear.
 
Alpha zero I don't know how you achieved those figures? Which formula did you use?
 
1) take out the tire.
2) use a tachometer to measure the RPM at each speeds. u'll get N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, N6.
3) use the relation: RPM at first speed/RPM at second speed= gear ratio of 2 to 1. i.e. N1/N2=T2/T1. =1/7
4) the second gear ratio shd be N3/N2; the third shd be N4/N3 and so on.

this will only work though if ur gear box has compound gear train.

ur car has the sun and planet gear train or the epicyclic gear train. u need the structure to calculate the ratios. so u need to take it apart. I don't knw how it looks like but if u have a diagram post it, and then we can calculate.
 
I don't have access to the gearbox as it is only a theoretical gearbox! There must be a way of using geometric progression. My friend has worked it out but won't tell me! Argghhh!

The only clue he gave be is that the gears have a progressive increment of 1.4 but I need to know how he got to this??
 
  • #10
for the record i think this question is incomplete. how can u have a gear train without knowing the type of gear train? and u need to atleast have one speed to get smthng good out of the problem to analyse (yes u can assume the speed but then where's the fun in tht). saying that i'll have a go at the answer.

now,the clutch connects the engine shaft and the wheels at the 6th gear which makes the wheels run at the same speed as the engines [N2/N1=T2/T1=1] (pretty logical cause now u have the full power of the engine), and the speed shd decrease uniformly as u gear down from here. as the speed ratios are related to the gear ratios so they shd go down uniformly too. so the first gear ratio is 7:1 u need to divide it by 5 to equally distribute it amongst the 1-2, 2-3,3-4,4-5,5-6, gear ratios. (7/5=1.4). thts how ur friend got 1.4.
but this is wrong cause it shd be 6/5=1.2 [7(first gear ratio)- 1(6th gear ratio)=6]. then u'll have the following gear ratios:
2nd gear ratio: 5.8 ; 3rd gear ratio: 4.6; 4th gear ratio: 3.4; 5th gear ratio: 2.2. which is an AP with common difference of 1.2 rather than a GP.

I have no clue wat m talking abt:)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
1-2 = 19%
2-3 = 18%
3-4 = 17%
4-5 = 13%
5-6 = 8%

Works very well on a dirt bike my friend uses.
 
  • #12
NewKid;
You are very welcome here, and seem quite knowledgeable. That, unfortunately, is irrelevant when we have to break our brains in order to understand you. Please communicate in actual words. That "u" stuff, especially with no sense of capitalization or punctuation, just gives literate people headaches.
 
  • #13
crabbies2011
Were you able to replicate AlephZero's result (geometric sequence)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
21K
Replies
3
Views
2K