MHB Randomly choosing job applicants

  • Thread starter Thread starter nickar1172
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Job
nickar1172
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Among 15 male applicants for a job, 9 have wives. If 3 of the males are randomly chosen for consideration, find the probability that:

a) none have wives
b) only 1 has a wife
c) 2 have wives
d) all 3 have wives

is this hypergeometric distribution and if so do are each of the choices (a,b,c,d) represent the value for n (not N which is the population size)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
nickar1172 said:
Among 15 male applicants for a job, 9 have wives. If 3 of the males are randomly chosen for consideration, find the probability that:

a) none have wives
b) only 1 has a wife
c) 2 have wives
d) all 3 have wives

is this hypergeometric distribution and if so do are each of the choices (a,b,c,d) represent the value for n (not N which is the population size)?

Yes this is a hypergeometric distribution question with population size $$N$$ being $$15$$, total successes in the population $$K$$ being $$9$$ , sample size $$n$$ being $$3$$ and the number of successes $$k$$ being $$0,\ 1,\ 2,\ 3$$ for parts a, b, c and d respectively.

See the Wikepedia article

However having made the observation that this question involves the hypergeometric distribution, with these numbers I would do these calculations by hand:

a) First choice has no wife with prob $$6/15$$, second $$5/14$$, third $$4/13$$ so required prob $$\frac{6\times 5 \times 4}{15 \times 14 \times 13}$$

b) First choice has a wife with prob $$9/15$$, second has no wife $$6/14$$, third has no wife $$5/13$$ so the prob $$\frac{9\times 6 \times 5}{15 \times 14 \times 13}$$ but any of the choices may have the wife so the final answer is \(3\) times this.

c) ....
 
Last edited:
nickar1172 said:
Among 15 male applicants for a job, 9 have wives. If 3 of the males are randomly chosen for consideration, find the probability that:

a) none have wives
b) only 1 has a wife
c) 2 have wives
d) all 3 have wives

is this hypergeometric distribution and if so do are each of the choices (a,b,c,d) represent the value for n (not N which is the population size)?
Yes, it is a hypergeometric distribution but I would not consider that particularly relevant to solving this problem. That it is "selection without replacement" is much more relevant.

I don't know what you mean by "represent the value for n" since you haven't said what "n" is or what it represents.

Here is how I would do this problem:
a) Initially there are 15 applicants, 9 of whom have wives, 6 do not. The probability the first chosen does not have a wife is 6/15= 2/5. There are now 14 applicants, 5 of whom do not have wives. The probability the second chosen does not have a wife is 5/14. There are now 13 applicants, 4 of whom do not have wives. The probability the third chosen does not have a wife is 4/13.

The probability none of the three have wives is (2/5)(5/14)(4/13)= 8/((13)(14))

b) Start similarly. Initially, there are 15 applicants, 9 of whom have wives. The probability the first applicant chosen has a wife is 9/15= 3/5. There are now 14 applicants, 6 of whom do NOT have a wife. The probability the next chosen does not have a wife is 6/14= 3/7. Finally, there are 13 applicants, 5 of whom do not have wives. The probability the last chosen does not have a wife is 5/13.

The probability the first chosen has a wife and the other two do not is (3/5)(3/7)(5/13)= 9/((7)(13)).

Of course, you also have to consider the cases in which the second chosen or the third chosen is the one with the wife but it is easy to see that, while the fractions are different, the numerators and denominators are the same, just in different order, so the product is the same. To get the total probability, multiply that fraction by 3: 27/((7)(13)).

(c) and (d) are the same, just with "has a wife" and "does not have a wife" reversed.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top