Chemistry Reaction Mechanism of Cl2 and CHCl3

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the reaction mechanism involving Cl2 and CHCl3, specifically the roles of Cl and CCl3. It is clarified that Cl is generated rapidly from Cl2 and is consumed slowly in the reaction with CHCl3, while CCl3 is produced slowly but consumed quickly. The correct answer to the question posed is only A) Cl, as it aligns with the defined reaction kinetics. The distinction made is that both species can be considered intermediates, but the problem requires a specific interpretation of their roles. Understanding the rates of production and consumption is crucial for correctly identifying the intermediates in this reaction.
i_love_science
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Which response identifies the intermediate(s) in the following mechanism?
Cl2 -> 2 Cl (fast)
Cl + CHCl3 -> CCl3 + HCl (slow)
CCl3 + Cl -> CCl4 (fast)

A) Cl
B) CCl3
C) CHCl3
D) Both Cl and CHCl3
Relevant Equations
reaction mechanism
I think the answer is both A) Cl and B) CCl3, since both are produced and used up. The correct solution is only A). Could anyone explain why? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cl is produced quickly by
$$Cl_2\rightarrow 2Cl$$
and consumed slowly by
$$Cl+CHCl_3\rightarrow CCl_3+HCl$$
On the other hand, ##CCl3## is produced slowly and consumed quickly.

IMO both A) and B) are intermediates, but this problem uses a different logic.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top