Relativistic mass increase due to high temperatures inside stars?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relativistic mass increase of protons in the Sun's core, where temperatures reach 15.7×10^6 Kelvins. At such high temperatures, protons achieve significant velocities, potentially leading to a measurable increase in mass due to relativistic effects. This phenomenon may influence the gravitational pull of stars and raises questions about its implications for dark matter, as the energy-mass equivalence principle (E=mc²) suggests that energy contributes to gravitational mass. The Sun's luminosity, quantified at 3.85×10^26 W, results in a mass loss of approximately 4.27×10^9 kg/s, which is negligible compared to its total mass of 1.99×10^30 kg, indicating that energy production and output are in equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and its implications on mass and energy
  • Knowledge of stellar physics, particularly solar luminosity and core temperatures
  • Familiarity with the concept of relativistic mass and its calculations
  • Basic grasp of energy-mass equivalence (E=mc²)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of relativistic mass in high-energy environments
  • Study the relationship between stellar luminosity and mass loss in stars
  • Explore the role of energy in gravitational calculations within general relativity
  • Investigate the current theories surrounding dark matter and its properties
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of physics interested in the dynamics of stellar bodies, the effects of high temperatures on particle behavior, and the relationship between mass and energy in the context of general relativity.

kahoon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Wikipedia says that the core temperature of our Sun is 15.7×10^6 Kelvins.

I don't know what that means in terms of protons' velocities inside the core, but I bet they move pretty fast. Could they move that fast that they have a noticeable increase in mass due to their relativistic speed?

Could this influence the overall gravitational pull of a star?

Could this be an explanation for dark matter?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
They move at ~0,1% light speed, that doesn't contribute noticeable to the star's mass. Maybe one part in a million.
 
Because E=mc^2, a massive amount of energy is needed to resemble a small amount of mass both inertial and gravitational.

Let's look at how much mass the Sun "sheds" every second due to it's luminosity. The solar luminosity is 3.85*10^26W. That's equivalent of only 4.27*10^9kg/s. Considering the Sun's mass is 1.99*10^30kg, the mass of the sun is 21 orders of magnitude larger than the "luminosity mass". To be in equilibrium the Sun's energy production is roughly equal to the energy output (or else it would get hotter and hotter and eventually explode as all that energy built up!).

The other important point to note; however, is that this "mass" is already included in our calculations. We calculate the mass of massive stellar bodies from the orbits of objects orbiting them. We cannot tell if this gravitational mass is sourced by actual rest mass or by energy. In general relativity, both mass AND energy source gravity. To us, making these calculations, they are the same. We can't tell a shred of difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K