Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Robust, novel, innovative, and unprecedented

  1. Dec 15, 2015 #1


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    The following article just appeared in the British Medical Journal:

    Vinkers CH, Tijdink JK, Otte WM. Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis. BMJ 2015;351:h6467

    Here is a related news item from the first author's institution, unfortunately in Dutch only. The publication was also mentioned in the Dutch popular press today.

    In any case, I wonder to what extent a similar phenomenon would also be visible in the contemporary physics and mathematics literature. (The authors only looked at publications in PubMed.) Perhaps the trend signalled in the article is due to the tendency of most scientists to be "excellent" these days.
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 15, 2015 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    (emphasis added)

    It is not that scientists assume that, but that it is the case for many top journals. I've seen cover letters longer than articles themselves in order to justify why this is important enough research for journal X.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook