A $S^+$ and $S^{-}$ operators formula

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter LagrangeEuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Operators
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
For ##\hat{S}^+## and ##\hat{S}^{-}## operators for any given spin ##S## relation
\hat{S}^+|S,m \rangle=\sqrt{S(S+1)-m(m+1)}\hbar|S,m+1 \rangle
\hat{S}^-|S,m \rangle=\sqrt{S(S+1)-m(m-1)}\hbar|S,m-1 \rangle
Can someone please explain how we get those factors ##\sqrt{S(S+1)-m(m+1)}\hbar## and ##\sqrt{S(S+1)-m(m-1)}\hbar##?
In ##|S,m \rangle## ##S## denotes spin, and ##m## spin projection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought someone would already have answered this. For people who like algebra, it's one of those fun things to derive in quantum mechanics.

Let me list some facts about these operators
  1. ##S^{+} = S_x + i S_y##
  2. ##S^{-} = S_x - i S_y##
  3. ##S^2 = S_x^2 + S_y^2 + S_z^2##
  4. ##S_x S_y - S_y S_x = i S_z##
  5. ##S_z S^{+} = S^{+} (S_z + 1)##
  6. ##S_z S^{-} = S^{-} (S_z - 1)##
  7. ##S^{-} S^{+} = S^2 - S_z(S_z + 1)##
  8. ##(S^{+})^\dagger = S^{-}##
(The last 4 are provable from the first 4).

So if we let ##|m\rangle## be the state with ##S_z |m \rangle = m | m \rangle##,
then ##S_z S^- |m\rangle = S^- (S_z - 1) |m\rangle = S^- (m - 1) |m\rangle = (m-1) S^- |m\rangle##. So ##S^-|m\rangle## is an eigenstate of ##S_z## with eigenvalue ##m-1##. That means (assuming nondegeneracy of eigenvalues---I'm going to skip the argument for why this is the case, because I'm not sure why) that ##S^- |m\rangle## must be a multiple of ##|m-1\rangle##. So let's let ##\alpha_m## be the multiplier:

##S^- |m\rangle = \alpha_m |m-1\rangle##

Analogously, we can show that ##S^+ |m\rangle## has to be an eigenstate of ##S_z## with eigenvalue ##m+1##. So

##S^+ |m\rangle = \beta_m |m+1\rangle##

where ##\beta_m## is some unknown multiplier. We can relate ##\alpha_m## and ##\beta_m## by considering

##\langle m| S^- S^+ |m \rangle##

By our assumptions about ##S^+## and ##S^{-}##, we get:

##\langle m| S^- S^+ |m \rangle = \langle m| (S^+ \beta_m |m+1\rangle) = \langle m |\alpha_{m+1} \beta_m |m\rangle = \alpha_{m+1} \beta_m##. But we also know that ##\langle m| S^- S^+ |m \rangle = (S^+ |m\rangle)^\dagger (S^+ |m\rangle) = \langle m | \beta_m^* \beta_m |m \rangle##. So this proves that

##\beta_m^* = \alpha_{m+1}##

Now on the one hand:

##S^- S^+ |m\rangle = S^- \beta_m |m+1\rangle = \alpha_{m+1} \beta_m |m\rangle = |\beta_m|^2 |m \rangle##

On the other hand, by equation 7 above,

##S^- S^+ |m\rangle = (S^2 - S_z(S_z+1)) |m\rangle = (S^2 - m(m+1)) |m\rangle##

So we conclude that ##\beta_m = \sqrt{S^2 - m(m+1)}##.

But what are the eigenvalues of ##S^2##? Well, since ##S^2## must be greater than or equal to ##S_z^2##, we know that we can't keep raising the value of ##S_z## forever. But since ##S^+ |m\rangle = \beta_m |m+1\rangle##, the only way to prevent raising ##m## indefinitely is if for some maximal value of ##m##,

##S^+ |m_{\text{max}}\rangle = 0##

That implies that ##\beta_{m_{\text{max}}} = 0##.

So since we know an expression for ##\beta_m##,

##\sqrt{S^2 - m_{\text{max}}(m_{\text{max}}+1)} = 0##

That implies that ##S^2 = m_{\text{max}}(m_{\text{max}}+1)##

Rewriting ##m_{\text{max}} \equiv s## gives:
##S^2 =s (s+1)##

and ##\beta_m = \sqrt{s(s+1) - m(m+1)}##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71, LagrangeEuler, PeroK and 2 others
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
416
Replies
1
Views
504
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Back
Top