Schrödinger's Equation Infinite Potential Well

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Schrödinger's Equation in the context of an infinite potential well, specifically the equation ##\frac{d^2 \psi (x)}{{dt}^2}+\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))=0##. It concludes that the wavefunction ##\psi(x)## must equal zero in regions where the potential ##V(x)## is infinite, as this implies zero probability of finding a particle in those regions. The solutions for the wavefunction are derived separately for three distinct regions: ##\psi_L(x)## for ##x \leq a##, ##\psi_0(x)## for ##a < x < b##, and ##\psi_R(x)## for ##x \geq b##. The boundary conditions ##\psi_L(a) = \psi_0(a)## and ##\psi_R(b) = \psi_0(b)## are essential for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's Equation
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts such as wavefunctions and potential wells
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in differential equations
  • Basic grasp of probability distributions in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the differences between bound states and scattering states in quantum systems
  • Explore Messiah's Quantum Mechanics textbook, particularly volume 1, for a comprehensive understanding of the time-independent Schrödinger equation
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for solving differential equations in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of wavefunctions in potential wells.

Bullington
Gold Member
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
Given the equation ##\frac{d^2 \psi (x)}{{dt}^2}+\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))=0## the general solution is:
$$\psi (x)=A_1 e^{ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}} +A_2 e^{-ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}}$$
If we have an infinite potential well: ## V(x)=\begin{cases} \infty \quad x\ge b\\ 0 \quad a < x < b \\ \infty \quad x \le a \end{cases}## then would that mean I take the limit of x to a and b and both should equal zero? So:

$$\lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left(A_1 e^{ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}} +A_2 e^{-ix \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(E-V(x))}}\right)=0+\lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left( A_2 e^{x \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(V(x)-E)}}\right)$$ where ## \lim_{x\rightarrow a}\left( A_2 e^{x \sqrt{\frac{2m}{{\hbar}^2}(V(x)-E)}}\right)## diverges. But how could that be zero? Would this mean that ##A_2## must be Zero?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution doesn't have to be the same (that is, the values of ##A_1## and ##A_2## don't have to be the same) in all three regions. Indeed, the potential is different in the different regions so you're looking at different differential equations in the different regions, so you'd expect the solutions to be different. Call the three solutions ##\psi_L(x)## (##x\le{a}##), ##\psi_0(x)## (##a\le{x}\le{b}##) and ##\psi_R(x)## (##x\ge{b}##) and solve for them separately within their own domains. You should be able to convince yourself that ##\psi_L(x)=\psi_R(x)=0## pretty quickly, leaving only ##\psi_0(x)## to work out.

Then apply the boundary condition ##\psi_L(a)=\psi_0(a)## and ##\psi_R(b)=\psi_0(b)##, and you'll be home. You can take ##a=0## without loss of generality and the problem becomes a bit simpler.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bullington
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
 
Bullington said:
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
For a particle's wavefunction to have a nonzero value at a region where the potential is infinite would suggest that there is a nonzero probability amplitude associated with finding that particle in the region. How can a particle with finite energy exist in a region of space with infinite potential?
 
Bullington said:
Ah, I See now. Last question then; why is ##\psi (x) =0## when ##V(x)=\infty##?
In my intro QM class many years ago, the professor used the method of emphatic assertion to demonstrate the truth of this proposition. :-p

You can get a somewhat more rigorous-looking argument by solving Schrödinger's equation for a finite positive potential, applying the boundary condition that ##\psi(\pm\infty)=0##, and then considering the limit as ##V## approaches infinity. That boundary condition can be justified as requiring that the wave function be a sensible probability distribution, meaning that its squared integral across all space is equal to unity.

However, as a practical matter it is reasonable to look for solutions assuming that an infinite repulsive potential in a region means zero probability of the particle being found in that region, which is equivalent to saying that ##\psi=0## in that region.
 
Don't forget that in general there are both bound states, where ##\psi(x) \rightarrow 0## for ##x \rightarrow \pm \infty## and "scattering states", where the wave function becomes sinusoidal for ##x \rightarrow \infty## and/or ##x \rightarrow -\infty##. A very good treatment of the one-dimensional time-independent Schrödinger equation can be found in Messiah's QM textbook (vol. 1, if I remember right).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K