Searchable museum of American history

  • Context: History 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the exploration of American history through the lens of archaeological findings, particularly regarding the settlement of North America and the implications of recent discoveries related to pre-Clovis peoples. Participants examine various hypotheses about the origins and migration patterns of early inhabitants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express interest in the Gilcrease Museum's collection, noting its extensive range of items related to North American history.
  • There is a contention regarding the timeline of American settlement, with some arguing that the question remains unresolved and highlighting conflicting hypotheses, particularly concerning findings in South America.
  • One participant mentions evidence suggesting that flint tools found in North America may share similarities with early European techniques rather than the Clovis culture.
  • Another participant references the possibility of pre-Clovis peoples who may have migrated south by sailing along the west coast, indicating a shift in understanding of early human migration.
  • Some participants discuss the genetic links between modern Indigenous populations in North America and Siberian populations, suggesting a complex migration history.
  • There is mention of the need for mitochondrial DNA investigations to clarify the narrative of early settlers, with some speculating that multiple migration stories may exist.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the origins and migration patterns of early Americans, with multiple competing views and ongoing debates about the evidence and interpretations of archaeological findings.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the current understanding of early American settlement, including unresolved questions about the Bering Strait land bridge and the implications of genetic studies.

Evo
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,032
Reaction score
3,277
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Science news on Phys.org
More art than history. They say 12,000 BC but I couldn't find anything. AFAIK the question of American settlement is still not finally answered. There are some conflicting hypothesis, especially with findings in South America, but as well some evidence, that flintstones found had more in common with early European techniques than with the Clovis. And there is evidence for earlier findings than the Bering Strait bridge would have allowed. Sorry, if that was a distracting commentary, but I find the question about the first immigrants extremely exciting.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
fresh_42 said:
More art than history. They say 12,000 BC but I couldn't find anything. AFAIK the question of American settlement is still not finally answered. There are some conflicting hypothesis, especially with findings in South America, but as well some evidence, that flintstones found had more in common with early European techniques than with the Clovis. And there is evidence for earlier findings than the Bering Strait bridge would have allowed. Sorry, if that was a distracting commentary, but I find the question about the first immigrants extremely exciting.
Yes, there has been a lot of controversy over the first people to settle North America. Clovis was long thought to be the first but now seems to have been overturned.
 
Here is an article on recent findings about pre-Clovis people who probably got south by sailing down the west coast.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo
BillTre said:
Here is an article on recent findings about pre-Clovis people who probably got south by sailing down the west coast.
Paywall for me. The difficulty with too pre-Clovis is I think the missing land bridge in the Bering Strait.

I have seen a South American (I think it was a Chilean) anthropologist who favors the idea of polynesian first settlers, at least in South America. And IIRC the genes of todays Indian civilizations in the north fit better to Siberian populations than South East Asian. And the flintstone fabric found in the US might indicate an early European influence, which was proposed by an American anthropologist. That is pretty far fetched, but not impossible. We simply assume they couldn't sail such distances. It could explain the eastern settlers while North America was buried beneath an ice shield.

I guess we'll have to wait until mitDNA investigations tell us the whole story, if it is one story at all, and not two or three. Until then it's a big mystery.
 
fresh_42 said:
Paywall for me.
Opps, thought it wasn't for some reason.
Its about an inland finding, up the Columbia river, that predates clovis and has different style tools.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
44K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K