Seeing the milky way in it's past

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Snuka_wut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    milky way
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the implications of the finite speed of light and the expansion of the universe on our observations of galactic cores. It concludes that, due to the gravitational binding of galaxies, the Milky Way cannot be observed as it was billions of years ago through deep field images. The analogy of a river flowing into the ocean illustrates that while the universe expands, galaxies remain intact. Furthermore, the discussion highlights the concept of a Doppler shift, indicating that light from distant points in the universe cannot reach us due to the accelerating expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the finite speed of light
  • Familiarity with the expansion of the universe
  • Knowledge of gravitational binding in astrophysics
  • Concept of Doppler shift in light waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the finite speed of light on astronomical observations
  • Study the effects of gravitational binding on galaxy formation and stability
  • Explore the concept of cosmic inflation and its impact on the universe's expansion
  • Learn about the Doppler effect and its applications in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the dynamics of the universe and the nature of light in cosmic observations.

Snuka_wut
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Alright, this has been egging me for awhile now, so here it goes. If light has a finite speed, and the rate of acceleration of the expansion of the universe has sped inflation up past this finite speed, is it possible that one of the young galactic cores we observed through the deep field image is in fact the milky way as it was billions of years ago, with that light just now reaching us? And if that's possible do you think we could track, via imagery, the evolution of our galaxy?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Snuka_wut said:
is it possible that one of the young galactic cores we observed through the deep field image is in fact the milky way as it was billions of years ago, with that light just now reaching us? And if that's possible do you think we could track, via imagery, the evolution of our galaxy?
No
Two reasons, since we are in the milky way we have been moving with it as space expands, so the light from it has always had the same distance to travel to us. So we have always seen the center (30,000lyr away) as it was 30,000yr before NOW for all NOW

Secondly expansion of the universe doesn't change the size of galaxies - things which are held together by gravity stay together as the universe expands.
It's like imagining a river flowing out to sea. The river flow expands out into the ocean, but a boat that is floating down the river doesn't stretch out when it reaches the ocean - it is held together by bolts/welds etc in the same way as gravity holds a galaxy together.
 
Is this related to the analogy of the expanding universe like an inflating balloon? One possible conclusion of this is if you look far enough, you will see yourself (or your galaxy) off in the distance, the line of sight wrapping all the way around the balloon and back. I believe the answer to this is "most likely not". The expansion of the universe results in a Doppler shift so high that light emitted from one side of the universe would never get to the other side. Another way to put it is the distance between opposite points increases by at least one light year every year.

Another consequence is that if you were to take a high-relativistic spaceship out to circumnavigate the universe, at one point you would realize that you could never get to your destination and you could never return home. The universe at beyond some distance behaves though it is expanding faster then the speed of light. If the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is real, someday expansion may be so high, it will rip apart stars, atoms and subatomic particles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
13K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K