Is the Image of an Open Set Under a Continuous Function Always Open?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the image set S = {f(c): 0 < c < 1} under a continuous function f defined on the real numbers R. It is established that S is a connected and bounded subset of R, but not necessarily an open subset. The reasoning is based on the fact that the continuous image of a compact set is closed and bounded, and a counterexample is provided using the function f(x) = 0, demonstrating that the image of an open set can be closed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions in real analysis
  • Knowledge of compact sets and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concepts of open and closed sets in topology
  • Ability to construct counterexamples in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions on compact sets
  • Learn about the definitions and implications of open and closed sets in topology
  • Explore the concept of connectedness in subsets of R
  • Investigate additional counterexamples to the open mapping theorem
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of continuous functions and their implications in topology.

yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Let f be a real-valued function defined and continuous on the set of real numbers R. Which of the following must be true of the set S = {f(c): 0<c<1}?

I. S is a connected subset of R
II. S is an open subset of R
III. S is a bounded subset of R

The answer is I and III only. I understand why I is true. But, why is is bounded, and why is it not an open subset?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it is bounded because it is continuous on the compact set [0,1] and the continuous image of a compact (closed and bounded set) is closed and bounded, the image of (0,1) is a subsert of this bounnded set and is hence bounded.

define f(x) = 0 for all x. the image of an open set is then closed.
 
How can you reach a conclusion by simply considering the case f(x) = 0?
 
Because the question asks if it MUST be true that the image of an open set is open. I just showed that it isn't necessarily true. To disprove a statement it suffices to provide ONE counter example.

The negation of the statement 'for all continuous f (on R) the restriction to (0,1) is an open map (ie the image is open)' is 'there exists A continuous map on r R whose restriction to (0,1) is not an open map'.
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K