Show that ## {2n \choose n}\equiv 0\pmod {p} ##?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the binomial coefficient {2n choose n} is congruent to 0 modulo a prime p, given that n < p < 2n. The proof begins by expressing {2n choose n} in terms of factorials and shows that n! divides the product of terms from (n+1) to (2n). Since p is a prime greater than n and less than 2n, it follows that p divides this product. The gcd of p and n! is 1, confirming that p divides the binomial coefficient, leading to the conclusion that {2n choose n} is congruent to 0 modulo p. This establishes the required result for primes in the specified range.
Math100
Messages
813
Reaction score
229
Homework Statement
If ## p ## is a prime satisfying ## n<p<2n ##, show that ## {2n \choose n}\equiv 0\pmod {p} ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Let ## n ## be a positive integer.
Then ## {2n \choose n}= \frac{(2n)!}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{n!(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{n!} ##.
This means ## n!\mid [(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)] ##.
Since ## n<p<2n ##, it follows that ## p\mid [(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)] ##.
Note that ## gcd(p, n!)=1 ## because ## p ## is prime.
Thus ## p\mid\frac{(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{n!}\implies\ p\mid{2n \choose n}\implies {2n \choose n}\equiv 0\pmod {p} ##.
Therefore, if ## p ## is a prime satisfying ## n<p<2n ##, then ## {2n \choose n}\equiv 0\pmod {p} ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: If ## p ## is a prime satisfying ## n<p<2n ##, show that ## {2n \choose n}\equiv 0\pmod {p} ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof:

Let ## n ## be a positive integer.
Then ## {2n \choose n}= \frac{(2n)!}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{n!(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{n!} ##.
This means ## n!\mid [(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)] ##.
Since ## n<p<2n ##, it follows that ## p\mid [(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)] ##.
Note that ## gcd(p, n!)=1 ## because ## p ## is prime.
Thus ## p\mid\frac{(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{n!}\implies\ p\mid{2n \choose n}\implies {2n \choose n}\equiv 0\pmod {p} ##.
Therefore, if ## p ## is a prime satisfying ## n<p<2n ##, then ## {2n \choose n}\equiv 0\pmod {p} ##.
Correct. I only wonder what you needed
This means ## n!\mid [(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)] ##.
for. If you wanted to say that ##\binom{2n}{n}## is an integer, you could have just written it
Then ##\mathbb{Z}\ni {2n \choose n}= \frac{(2n)!}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{n!(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{n!} ##.
or
Then ## {2n \choose n}= \frac{(2n)!}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{n!(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{n!} \in \mathbb{Z}##.
I do not see why it is important that ##n!## divides ##(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n).##
 
fresh_42 said:
Correct. I only wonder what you needed

for. If you wanted to say that ##\binom{2n}{n}## is an integer, you have written

or

I do not see why it is important that ##n!## divides ##(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n).##
Yes, that was actually my intention. To indicate that ## {2n \choose n} ## is an integer. I didn't know that we can actually express ## {2n \choose n}\in\mathbb{Z} ##.
 
Math100 said:
Let ## n ## be a positive integer.
Then ## {2n \choose n}= \frac{(2n)!}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{n!(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{(n!)(n!)}= \frac{(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{n!} ##.
This means ## n!\mid [(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)] ##.
Why? If you know a priori that ##\binom{2n}{n}## is an integer, then the above is unnecessary. If you want prove that it's an integer, you should also say something like "product of ##n## consecutive terms is divisible by ##n!##" (prove this separately).
Math100 said:
Note that ## gcd(p, n!)=1 ## because ## p ## is prime.
Thus ## p\mid\frac{(n+1)(n+2)\dotsb (2n)}{n!}##.
Yes. In general, ##a\mid c## and ##b\mid c## does not imply ##ab\mid c##. In this case, it works. Why?
 
Last edited:
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: If ## p ## is a prime satisfying ## n<p<2n ##, show that ## {2n \choose n}\equiv 0\pmod {p} ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Note that gcd(p,n!)=1 because p is prime.
you should add that the prime p is ##p>n## because without that you might had the case that ##gcd(p,n!)=p##
 
nuuskur said:
Yes. In general, a∣c and b∣c does not imply ab∣c. In this case, it works. Why?
This is covered by saying ##gcd(p,n!)=1## but yeah it might not be so straightforward implication.
 
Back
Top