MHB Show that the function is 1-1 and onto

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
To prove that if a function f: A → B is one-to-one and onto, then its inverse f^(-1): B → A is also one-to-one and onto, one must first establish that for any distinct elements y1, y2 in B, the pre-images f^(-1)(y1) and f^(-1)(y2) are distinct. Since f is one-to-one, it guarantees that f(x) is unique for each x in A, ensuring that f^(-1) is well-defined. Additionally, because f is onto, every element in B has a corresponding element in A, confirming that f^(-1) is onto. The discussion emphasizes the need to apply f^(-1) correctly and suggests reversing the argumentation for clarity. The conclusion is that the properties of f directly imply the properties of its inverse.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Smile)

I want to prove that, if $f: A \xrightarrow[\text{onto}]{\text{1-1}} B$, then $f^{-1}: B \xrightarrow[\text{onto}]{\text{1-1}} A$.

That's what I have tried:

Let $x,y \in dom(f)$, with $x \neq y$.
Then, since $f:\text{ 1-1 }$, we have that $f(x) \neq f(y)$.
Also, since $f: \text{ onto } $, $\forall b \in B,\exists x$, such that $b=f(x)$.

Is it right so far?

We want to show that, if $y_1,y_2 \in B$, with $y_1 \neq y_2$, then $f^{-1}(y_1) \neq f^{-1}(y_2)$ and that $\forall x \in A, \exists d$, such that $f^{-1}(x)=d$, right?

If so, how could we show this? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

It's correct except the last equality, $$f^{-1}$$ should be applied in the rhs.

Given $$y \in B$$ and the condition f onto implies that $$f^{-1}(y) $$ is non empty, and 1-1 implies that $$f^{-1}(y)$$ is just one point so the inverse of f is well defined.

Try to reverse this argumentation.
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K