Simplest Understanding of the Universe

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JeremyL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the quest for a simple understanding of the universe, touching on concepts of matter, energy, space, time, and the nature of physical laws. Participants explore the challenges of comprehending reality and the role of scientific laws in describing the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a straightforward explanation of the universe, proposing that it consists of physical matter and energy occupying space and time, governed by natural laws.
  • Another participant argues against the notion that physical laws are created, suggesting instead that the universe's behavior informs us of these laws.
  • A further response acknowledges the creation of analytic statements through language to describe observed behaviors of the universe.
  • Another participant emphasizes the difficulty of achieving a true understanding of reality, noting that even experts in physics and cosmology do not claim to fully understand the universe.
  • This participant suggests that while everyone has a personal understanding of reality, a generalized objective understanding remains elusive, with much still to learn from ongoing research in cosmology and physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of physical laws, with some asserting they are created while others argue they are discovered through observation. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the simplest understanding of the universe and the challenges involved in achieving a comprehensive grasp of reality.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining physical laws and the subjective nature of understanding reality, with participants acknowledging the limitations of personal comprehension versus objective knowledge.

JeremyL
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm not smart and know nothing of cosmology or physics but I seek an understanding of reality. I'm looking for the simplest explanation for the universe I can find so that I actually understand it. Is the following factual at all?

The universe is constantly changing physical matter and energy.

This matter and energy occupies space and changes over time.

Therefore, the universe is matter/energy occupying space/time.

However, sometimes the matter and energy that we perceive appears to exist in a non-random form.

This is illustrated by the sight of a whole spiral galaxy.

To explain this phenomenon, we created the physical/scientific laws of the universe.

Therefore, the overall universe, as far as we currently know, is the following:

Physical matter/energy occupying space/time subject to natural physical/scientific laws.
 
Space news on Phys.org
I wouldn't say we "create" physical law. The universe behaves as it does and we observe it. It *tells* us what the laws are.
 
bapowell said:
I wouldn't say we "create" physical law. The universe behaves as it does and we observe it. It *tells* us what the laws are.

Right, but we created the analytic statements via language which we think best describe how the universe seems to behave through our observation.
 
JeremyL said:
I'm not smart and know nothing of cosmology or physics but I seek an understanding of reality. I'm looking for the simplest explanation for the universe I can find so that I actually understand it.
This will be difficult (probably impossible) since even very very smart people with decades of training and experience in physics and cosmology don't claim to understand our universe ('reality').

If you just want "an understanding" of reality, then that's easy ... everybody has that. It's what enables you to successfully navigate the world of your experience. However if you want to "actually understand" reality in some sort of generalized objective sense, then, afaik, nobody has that (though lots of talented people are working on it). The thing is that, apparently, there's lots of stuff going on outside of, or underlying and fundamental wrt, our direct and instrumentally augmented sensory apprehension of our universe (of reality).

Nevertheless, you can learn (at least some of ... maybe a lot of) what cosmologists and astrophysicists and physicists have learned and have to say about our universe.

You might make it a hobby to read stuff posted at PF and similar sites. Read some textbooks. Read some journal articles. Etc. If you stick with it, then you'll be increasingly fascinated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K