Simplify Exponents and Confirm with Wolfram Alpha: (54-3y)3 * (5y-2)2 Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaleSwanson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Exponents
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying an expression involving exponents: (54-3y)³ * (5y-2)². Participants are exploring the correct application of exponent rules and comparing their results with those obtained from Wolfram Alpha.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to simplify the expression and questions the correctness of their result compared to Wolfram Alpha's output. Some participants suggest reviewing exponentiation rules and correcting the application of those rules in the original poster's calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying the application of exponent rules. Guidance has been offered regarding the correct approach to exponentiation, and there is acknowledgment of mistakes as part of the learning process.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of confusion regarding the application of exponent rules, and the original poster expresses concern about their understanding of the material. The discussion reflects a learning environment where mistakes are viewed as opportunities for growth.

DaleSwanson
Messages
350
Reaction score
2
So I just got back from my math class, we were going over exponents. Right before we left he gave us a problem and we turned it in, I was just wondering if I got it right.

Simplify:
(54-3y)3 * (5y-2)2

I got:
512-9y3 * 5y2-4

5-9y3+y2+8

I applied the powers to the parenthesis, then added the two exponents. The addition of the exponents is here:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%2812-9y^3%29+%2B+%28y^2+-+4%29

However when I just pop the original problem into wolfram alpha I get:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28%285^%284-3y%29%29^3%29+*+%28%285^%28y-2%29%29^2%29
58-7y

So I guess I have two questions. First is my answer right? Second how did Wolfram come up with that answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are applying the exponentiation rules incorrectly in your first step - perhaps you want to review it. When you bring down the 3, you multiply it to the (4-3y) to get (12-9y) instead of taking powers. Do the same for the other term. Then you can reduce the exponents.

See rules 3 here: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExponentLaws.html
 
Thanks. Stupid mistake, always the stupid mistakes.
 
That's fine - when you make mistakes you go back and look at the definitions, problems, and learn a lot that way. Cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K