Simultaneous diagonalization and replacement of operators with eigenvalues ?

Click For Summary
If an operator commutes with a Hamiltonian, simultaneous diagonalization is possible, allowing the operator to be replaced with its eigenvalue in the Hamiltonian. The proof involves examining the action of the operator on its eigenvectors, demonstrating that the commuting property ensures the eigenvectors remain unchanged under the operation of the Hamiltonian. This replacement is valid only when the operator acts on its specific eigenvector, using the corresponding eigenvalue. The discussion highlights that while the proof is straightforward for non-degenerate eigenvalues, complications arise in cases of degeneracy, though simultaneous diagonalization remains achievable. Understanding these principles is essential in quantum mechanics for simplifying operator expressions.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Apparently, if I have a Hamiltonian that contains an operator, and that operator commutes with the Hamiltonian, not only can we "simultaneously diagonalize" the Hamiltonian and the operator, but I can go through the Hamiltonian and replace the operator with its eigenvalue everywhere I see it show up. Can someone please explain why this is? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The proof that you can simultaneously diagonalize commuting operators should be available in any elementary quantum mechanics text. IIRC it goes something like this:

1. We examine an eigenvector of operator A with eigenvalue a: A|a> = a|a>
2. Now act with B (remember numbers commute with operators: BA|a> = a B |a>
3. We assume B commutes with A: BA |a> = AB |a>
4. Use 2 to replace in 3: A(B |a> )= a (B |a>)
5. Now we see that B|a> is an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue a. Thus, B can only scale |a> by a constant which means |a> is an eigenvector of B. I've assumed A has no degenerate eigenvectors; the situation gets a bit trickier under conditions of degeneracy, but you can still prove that commuting operators can be simultaneously diagonalized.

You can only replace the operator with its eigenvalue when the operator is operating on one of its eigenvectors, and then you have to use the eigenvalue associated with that eigenvector. And that's because of the definition of eigenvectors/eigenvalues.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
602
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K