Skeptic Magazine Interview With Robert Sternberg on The Bell Curve

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The interview with Robert Sternberg in Skeptic Magazine critically examines the claims made in The Bell Curve regarding intelligence and race. Sternberg argues that intelligence is a complex construct influenced by various factors, including environment and education, rather than solely genetics. He highlights the flawed methodology of The Bell Curve, particularly its reliance on IQ tests, which may not accurately reflect true intelligence due to cultural biases. Additionally, Sternberg warns against the ethical implications of suggesting inherent racial differences in intelligence, advocating for a more inclusive understanding of individual potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of intelligence theories, particularly Howard Gardner's multiple intelligences.
  • Familiarity with the concept of IQ testing and its criticisms.
  • Knowledge of the historical context surrounding The Bell Curve and its authors.
  • Awareness of ethical considerations in psychological research and discussions on race.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences and its critiques.
  • Explore the methodology of IQ testing and its implications for measuring intelligence.
  • Read Jensen's "The g Factor" for a counterpoint to Sternberg's arguments.
  • Investigate the ethical ramifications of intelligence research in social contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Psychologists, educators, sociologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of intelligence, race, and ethics in psychological research.

Carlos Hernandez
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
From Skeptic vol. 3, no. 3, 1995, pp. 72-80.
The following article is copyright © 1995 by the Skeptics Society, P.O. Box 338, Altadena, CA 91001, (818) 794-3119. Permission has been granted for noncommercial electronic circulation of this article in its entirety, including this notice. For more information, visit www.skeptic.com

Skeptic Magazine Interview With Robert Sternberg on The Bell Curve

Complete text at http://www.skeptic.com/03.3.fm-sternberg-interview.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sternberg recites the standard refrain quite well. Two serious omissions that never get brought up is 1) has anyone been able to respond to Jensen's "factor X," if the difference is environmental - then show it! The second is, are Whites environmentally deprived because we have lower IQs than East Asians or Ashkenazi Jews? The IQ debate about average intelligence between races is purely political. Sternberg is allied somewhat with Gardner, who has been completely discredited because his theory of multiple intelligences cannot be tested. It is a feel-good story for the media. Jensen's Chapter 12 is available at http://www.neoeugenics.com/ if anyone here wants to read it. It is THE rebuttal to Sternberg. One might note that when The Bell Curve issue is brought up, both the APA's "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" as well as Jensen's "The g Factor" are ignored - and for good reason for the radical environmentalists. They have lost the battle, it just has not made it past the media egalitarians to the public yet.
 



The interview with Robert Sternberg on The Bell Curve, published in Skeptic Magazine in 1995, provides a valuable insight into the controversial book and its implications. Sternberg, a renowned psychologist and researcher, shares his thoughts on the book's claims about intelligence and race, and offers a critical analysis of its methodology and conclusions.

One of the key points Sternberg makes is that intelligence is a complex and multi-faceted concept, and cannot be reduced to a single number or factor. This goes against the central thesis of The Bell Curve, which argues that intelligence is primarily determined by genetics and that racial differences in intelligence are largely due to genetic factors. Sternberg rightly points out that this oversimplification ignores the countless other factors that can influence intelligence, such as environment, education, and motivation.

Furthermore, Sternberg highlights the flawed methodology used by the authors of The Bell Curve, particularly their reliance on IQ tests as a measure of intelligence. As Sternberg explains, IQ tests are not a perfect measure of intelligence and can be influenced by a variety of factors such as cultural biases and test-taking skills. This raises questions about the validity of the book's claims about racial differences in intelligence, as these differences may be more a reflection of the test itself rather than actual intelligence.

Sternberg also addresses the ethical implications of The Bell Curve, particularly its suggestion that certain groups are inherently less intelligent than others. He argues that this type of thinking can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and lead to discrimination and inequality. Instead, Sternberg advocates for a more nuanced and inclusive understanding of intelligence, one that recognizes the diverse abilities and potential of individuals from all backgrounds.

In conclusion, the interview with Robert Sternberg provides a valuable critique of The Bell Curve and its controversial claims. His insights challenge the simplistic and problematic notions put forth by the book, and serve as a reminder to approach discussions of intelligence and race with caution and critical thinking.