Solution to Schroedinger Equation for a huge hypothetical

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sven Andersson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hypothetical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding a solution to the Schrödinger Equation (SE) for a hypothetical atom with an atomic number (Z) of 1,000,000 and an atomic weight of 2,000,000. The primary conclusion is that exact solutions for systems with more than two particles are complex and often unrealistic. The basic prediction indicates that the nucleus would likely break apart quickly, and electron binding energies would be minimal. The discussion emphasizes the need to evaluate the eigenfunctions and the expected momentum of the electron in the ground state to understand the feasibility of such a system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger Equation (SE)
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly the two-body problem
  • Knowledge of atomic structure and electron binding energies
  • Basic grasp of eigenfunctions and their significance in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the solutions to the Schrödinger Equation for the hydrogen atom
  • Explore the implications of high atomic numbers on nuclear stability
  • Investigate the concept of eigenfunctions in quantum mechanics
  • Study the relationship between momentum and velocity in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in theoretical atomic models and the implications of extreme atomic structures.

Sven Andersson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Solution to Schroedinger Equation for a huge hypothetical atom?

Let's say you have hypothetical atomic nucleus with a very large Z, say a million times of the most highly charged ones; what would be the solution to the SE at very large n's i.e. at very large distances, say several centimeters, from the hypothetical nucleus?

S.A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
... short answer: complicated.
Depends what you want to find out... the basic prediction is that the nucleus will break apart in a very short time, and that the electron binding energies would be, in any case, very small.

Note: It is very difficult to find exact solutions to the Schrödinger equation for systems of more than one or two particles.
 
Last edited:
Clarification; I meant a solution to SE for a two body problem; one electron and one nucleus with Z=1 000 000. Let's assume that the nucleus is stable and has atomic weight 2 000 000. And the solution I want is for n=1000 or higher (at a distance of several centimeters). What values do you plug in? What does the equation look like?
 
So you're looking for the solution for an electron bound in the field of a fixed point charge... That two body problem is just the hydrogen atom with potential ##U(r)=\frac{-Ze}{4\pi\epsilon_0{r}}##

Google for "hydrogen atom Schrödinger" will find it.
It won't be even slightly realistic for many reasons, but that's a different problem.
 
Last edited:
Sven Andersson said:
I meant a solution to SE for a two body problem; one electron and one nucleus with Z=1 000 000. Let's assume that the nucleus is stable and has atomic weight 2 000 000.
I suggest once you find the eigenfunctions to this problem, you do a quick evaluation of the expected value for the momentum of an electron in the ground state. Then divide by electron mass to get the average speed of the electron. Then come back and tell me why such a system can't exist (or is overlooking something fundamental).
 
What they said... also, the distance from the nucleus is a trickier concept than how you appear to be thinking.
Such conceptual exercizes can be good for uncovering these nuances.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
875
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K