MHB Solve Reduction of Order Legendre Polynomials Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reduction
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the Legendre polynomial equation using the method of reduction of order. The initial solution is established as a series expansion, leading to recurrence relations for the coefficients. The second solution, denoted as \(y_2\), is expressed in terms of the first solution \(y_1\) and involves integrating a derived expression. Participants explore the complexities of differentiating the series and substituting back into the original differential equation, aiming to eliminate the variable \(v\). Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes deriving the second solution \(Q_n(x)\) and finding specific values for \(P_0(x)\) and \(Q_0\).
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Legendre polynomials
I have one solution to $(1-x^2)y''-2xy'+\lambda^2 y=0$ and that is
$$
\lambda^2a_0 - (2 - \lambda^2)xa_1 + 2a_2 + 6xa_3 + \sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right)\right]x^k = 0.
$$
From this equation, we can conclude $\lambda^2a_0 + 2a_2 = 0$ and $-(2 - \lambda^2)xa_1 + 6xa_3 = 0$.
Therefore,
$$
a_2 = -\frac{\lambda^2}{2}a_0\quad\text{and}\quad a_3 = \frac{2 - \lambda^2}{6}a_1.
$$
Finally, we have $a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right) = 0$, i.e.
$$
a_{k + 2} = \frac{k(k + 1) - \lambda^2}{(k + 2)(k + 1)}a_k.
$$
Use the method of reduction of order to derive the following formula for the Legendre functions of the 2nd kind:
$$
Q_n(x) = P_n(x)\int\frac{1}{[P_n(x)]^2(1 - x^2)}dx, \quad n = 0,1,2,\ldots
$$
I basically need to solve
$$
y_2 = y_1\int\frac{\exp\left(\int\frac{2x}{1-x^2}dx\right)}{y_1^2}
$$
where $y_1$ is my solution above, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi dwsmith, :)

dwsmith said:
Legendre polynomials
I have one solution to $(1-x^2)y''-2xy'+\lambda^2 y=0$ and that is
$$
\lambda^2a_0 - (2 - \lambda^2)xa_1 + 2a_2 + 6xa_3 + \sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right)\right]x^k = 0.
$$

From this equation, we can conclude $\lambda^2a_0 + 2a_2 = 0$ and $-(2 - \lambda^2)xa_1 + 6xa_3 = 0$.
Therefore,
$$
a_2 = -\frac{\lambda^2}{2}a_0\quad\text{and}\quad a_3 = \frac{2 - \lambda^2}{6}a_1.
$$
Finally, we have $a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right) = 0$, i.e.
$$
a_{k + 2} = \frac{k(k + 1) - \lambda^2}{(k + 2)(k + 1)}a_k.
$$

Note that,

\[\lambda^2a_0 - (2 - \lambda^2)xa_1 + 2a_2 + 6xa_3 + \sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right)\right]x^k = 0\]

\[\Rightarrow \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right)\right]x^k = 0\]

Therefore,

\[a_{k + 2} = \frac{k(k + 1) - \lambda^2}{(k + 2)(k + 1)}a_k\mbox{ for }k\geq 0\]

dwsmith said:
Use the method of reduction of order to derive the following formula for the Legendre functions of the 2nd kind:
$$
Q_n(x) = P_n(x)\int\frac{1}{[P_n(x)]^2(1 - x^2)}dx, \quad n = 0,1,2,\ldots
$$

You have the differential equation,

\[(1-x^2)y''-2xy'+\lambda^2 y=0\]

with the solution,

\[y_{1}(x)=P_{n}(x)\]

>>Here<< you can find an example of how to perform the method of reduction of order. Try to find the second solution \(y_{2}(x)=Q_{n}(x)\) using this method. Hope you can continue. :)

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Sudharaka said:
>>Here<< you can find an example of how to perform the method of reduction of order. Try to find the second solution \(y_{2}(x)=Q_{n}(x)\) using this method. Hope you can continue. :)

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.

I am looking through Zill's ODE book and it tells me to find the second solution using that formula I listed.
 
Doing $y_2 = y_1v$. I would have to take the derivative of that series twice? That is going to be bit messy I imagine.
$$
y_2 = v\sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right)\right]x^k
$$
$$
y_2' = v'\sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right)\right]x^k+
v\sum_{k = 1}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2k - k^2 - k^3\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^3 + 3k^2 + 2k\right)\right]x^{k-1}
$$
\begin{alignat}{3}
y_2'' & = & v''\sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right)\right]x^k\\
& + & 2v'\sum_{k = 1}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2k - k^2 - k^3\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^3 + 3k^2 + 2k\right)\right]x^{k-1}\\
& + \ &v\sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2(k^2-k) - k^4 + k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^4 + 2k^3 -k^2-2k\right)\right]x^{k-2}
\end{alignat}
Is there a better way to do this? I mean plugging this into the Legendre equation is going to be ridiculous.I plugged it into Mathematica and obtained
\begin{alignat}{2}
(1-x^2)\left(\sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2(k^2-k) - k^4 + k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^4 + 2k^3 -k^2-2k\right)\right]x^{k-2}\right) & -\\
2\left(\sum_{k = 1}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2k - k^2 - k^3\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^3 + 3k^2 + 2k\right)\right]x^{k-1}\right)(xv+(x^2-1)v' & +\\
\left(\sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}\left[a_k\left(\lambda^2 - k - k^2\right) + a_{k + 2}\left(k^2 + 3k + 2\right)\right]x^k\right)(\lambda^2v-2xv'+(1-x^2)v'')& =\\
& 0
\end{alignat}
However, Paul's notes says the v parameter should be eliminated. I let Mathematica do all the work and the v parameter is still present.
 
Last edited:
I think you are in a confusion as to what the solution to the differential equation is. :) It should be,

\[y_{1}=P_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{k}x^k\mbox{ where }\lambda^2=n(n+1)\]

You will find >>this<< helpful in understanding how to solve the Legendre's differential equation using Frobenius method.

So in the method of reduction of order you have to take,

\[y_{2}(x)=v(x)\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{k}x^k\]
 
Sudharaka said:
I think you are in a confusion as to what the solution to the differential equation is. :) It should be,

\[y_{1}=P_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{k}x^k\mbox{ where }\lambda^2=n(n+1)\]

You will find >>this<< helpful in understanding how to solve the Legendre's differential equation using Frobenius method.

So in the method of reduction of order you have to take,

\[y_{2}(x)=v(x)\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{k}x^k\]

That is what I did original to get my first solution. Now I am looking for a second solution.
 
dwsmith said:
That is what I did original to get my first solution. Now I am looking for a second solution.

Making that change I still have
$$
(1-x^2)\left(\sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}k(k-1)a_kx^{k-2}\right) -
2\left(\sum_{k = 1}^{\infty}ka_kx^{k-1}\right)(xv+(x^2-1)v') +
\left(\sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}a_kx^k\right)(\lambda^2v-2xv'+(1-x^2)v'') =
0
$$
 
dwsmith said:
Making that change I still have
$$
(1-x^2)\left(\sum_{k = 2}^{\infty}k(k-1)a_kx^{k-2}\right) -
2\left(\sum_{k = 1}^{\infty}ka_kx^{k-1}\right)(xv+(x^2-1)v') +
\left(\sum_{k = 0}^{\infty}a_kx^k\right)(\lambda^2v-2xv'+(1-x^2)v'') =
0
$$

Simplify this and equate the coefficients of similar powers of \(x\) to zero; similar to what you have done in your first post to find the recurrence relation.
 
Sudharaka said:
Simplify this and equate the coefficients of similar powers of \(x\) to zero; similar to what you have done in your first post to find the recurrence relation.

\begin{align}
a_0(\lambda^2v-2v'x+v'')+a_1(v''+2v'+vx(2+\lambda^2)+a_2(2+v'x)+6a_3+\\
\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}[a_{n+2}(n^2+3n+2)+a_{n+1}2v'(n+1)+a_n(v''+v( \lambda^2 -2n)-n(n-1))+a_{n-1}2v'n+a_{n-2}v'']x^n
\end{align}

Is this correct (^)?
If so,
$$
a_2 = \frac{2v'-v''-\lambda^2v}{2+v'x}a_0
$$
and
$$
a_3=-a_1\frac{v''+2v'+vx(\lambda^2+2)}{6}.
$$
 
  • #10
dwsmith said:
\begin{align}
a_0(\lambda^2v-2v'x+v'')+a_1(v''+2v'+vx(2+\lambda^2)+a_2(2+v'x)+6a_3+\\
\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}[a_{n+2}(n^2+3n+2)+a_{n+1}2v'(n+1)+a_n(v''+v( \lambda^2 -2n)-n(n-1))+a_{n-1}2v'n+a_{n-2}v'']x^n
\end{align}

Is this correct (^)?
If so,
$$
a_2 = \frac{2v'-v''-\lambda^2v}{2+v'x}a_0
$$
and
$$
a_3=-a_1\frac{v''+2v'+vx(\lambda^2+2)}{6}.
$$

The recurrence relations should not be dependent on \(x\). :)
 
  • #11
Sudharaka said:
The recurrence relations should not be dependent on \(x\). :)

What? That solution is following what you said.
 
  • #12
dwsmith said:
What? That solution is following what you said.

The recurrence relations you have obtained have \(x\) in them,

\[a_2 = \frac{2v'-v''-\lambda^2v}{2+v'{\color{red}x}}a_0\]

\[a_3=-a_1\frac{v''+2v'+v{\color{red}x}(\lambda^2+2)}{6}.\]

Anyway, thinking about this problem further I came to note that there is no need to substitute for \(P_{n}(x)\) since the answer is given in terms of \(P_{n}(x)\). So you can take,

\[y_{2}(x)=v(x)P_{n}(x)\]

and perform the reduction of order. Let me guide you through the first steps. The differential equation is,

\[(1-x^2)y''-2xy'+\lambda^2 y=0\]

We know that \(y_{1}(x)=P_{n}(x)\). Let, \(y_{2}(x)=Q_{n}(x)=v(x)P_{n}(x)\). Then,

\[(1-x^2)[v(x)P_{n}(x)]''-2x[v(x)P_{n}(x)]'+\lambda^2 v(x)P_{n}(x)=0\]

Using, \((1-x^2)P''_{n}(x)-2xP'_{n}(x)+\lambda^2 P_{n}(x)=0\) you can obtain,

\[2(1-x^2)v'(x)P'_{n}(x)+(1-x^2)v''(x)P_{n}(x)-2xv'(x)P_{n}(x)=0\]

\[\Rightarrow 2(1-x^2)v'(x)P_{n}(x) P'_{n}(x)+(1-x^2)v''(x)P_{n}^{2}(x)-2xv'(x)P_{n}^{2}(x)=0\]

\[\Rightarrow \frac{d}{dx}\left[(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)\right]v'(x)+[(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)]v''(x)=0\]

Now you should be able to solve for \(v(x)\) by separation of variables.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Sudharaka said:
\[\Rightarrow 2\frac{d}{dx}\left[(1-x^2)P_{n}(x)\right]v'(x)+[(1-x^2)P_{n}(x)]v''(x)=0\]

Now you should be able to solve for \(v(x)\) by separation of variables.

$$
\left[(1-x^2)P_{n}(x)\right]' = [P - x^2P]' = P' - 2xP - x^2P' = P'(1-x^2) - 2xP
$$
If I multiply 2 and v' in, we have
$$
4P'x
$$
which isn't right.
 
  • #14
dwsmith said:
$$
\left[(1-x^2)P_{n}(x)\right]' = [P - x^2P]' = P' - 2xP - x^2P' = P'(1-x^2) - 2xP
$$
If I multiply 2 and v' in, we have
$$
4P'x
$$
which isn't right.

Sorry. There was a little error. I have edited my last post (#12). :)
 
  • #15
Sudharaka said:
Sorry. There was a little error. I have edited my last post (#12). :)

Then we have
$$
\frac{v''}{v'} = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{[(1-x^2)P^2]'}{(1-x^2)P^2}\Rightarrow \ln v' = \frac{1}{2}\ln((1-x^2)P^2)
$$
I don't see how to go from this to the solution.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
dwsmith said:
Then we have
$$
\frac{v''}{v'} = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{[(1-x^2)P^2]'}{(1-x^2)P^2}\Rightarrow \ln v' = \frac{1}{2}\ln((1-x^2)P^2)
$$
I don't see how to go from this to the solution.

From where did the fraction \(\frac{1}{2}\) come from? :) Continuing from post #12 we have,

\[\frac{d}{dx}\left[(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)\right]v'(x)+[(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)]v''(x)=0\]

\[\Rightarrow -\frac{v''(x)}{v'(x)}=\frac{\frac{d}{dx}\left[(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)\right]}{[(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)]}\]

Integrate both sides and we get,

\[\ln[v'(x)]=\ln\left[(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)\right]^{-1}\]

\[\Rightarrow v'(x)=\frac{1}{(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)}\]

Integrate again to obtain,

\[v(x)=\int \frac{1}{(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)}\,dx\]

\[\therefore Q_{n}(x)=v(x)P_{n}(x)=P_{n}(x)\int \frac{1}{(1-x^2)P_{n}^{2}(x)}\,dx\]
 
  • #17
From this, how can I find $P_0(x)$?
 
  • #18
dwsmith said:
From this, how can I find $P_0(x)$?

You have,

\[P_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_k x^k\mbox{ where }a_{k + 2} = \frac{k(k + 1) - [n(n+1)]^2}{(k + 2)(k + 1)}a_k\]

Substitute \(n=0\) and try to obtain a solution to the recurrence relation.
 
  • #19
Sudharaka said:
You have,

\[P_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_k x^k\mbox{ where }a_{k + 2} = \frac{k(k + 1) - [n(n+1)]^2}{(k + 2)(k + 1)}a_k\]

Substitute \(n=0\) and try to obtain a solution to the recurrence relation.

How does one come up with $Q_0$ if $P_0$ is represented as a relation?
 
  • #20
dwsmith said:
How does one come up with $Q_0$ if $P_0$ is represented as a relation?

Recall that,

\[Q_{n}(x)=v(x)P_{n}(x)\]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K