Solve the problem involving linear programming

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,843
Reaction score
428
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
linear programming
Find question and solution here;

1649926836322.png

1649926878229.png


The initial steps were a bit confusing to me...i decided to use hours instead of minutes ...only then did it become more clear to me. See my graph,

1649926968509.png


Ok i follow that the function would be optimised at ##x=45## and ##y=6.25## ...now to my question...we cannot have ##y=6.25## products...a product can only take natural numbers, ##1,2,3...##
I can follow that the objective function would be ##=1.25## this is clear...only on the part of ##y=6.25##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
Ok i follow that the function would be optimised at ##x=45## and ##y=6.25## ...now to my question...we cannot have ##y=6.25## products...a product can only take natural numbers, ##1,2,3...##
I can follow that the objective function would be ##=1.25## this is clear...only on the part of ##y=6.25##.
There is no reason to expect integer-value answers

For example, exactly the same equations would apply if A and B were types of liquid with x and y representing the number of litres produced of each.

There is no reason why the optimal solution should give exact numbers of litres. In fact you would generally expect non-integer answers.

In your problem, as a final step, you might want to round-down to the nearest integer giving y=6 and the objective function = 1.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
True I had fixated my thinking solely on solid products...its true that the products could be of liquid or gaseous form... implying that the solution given is correct.