Solving for Horsepower w/ Unfamiliar Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter kriegera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Horsepower
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating horsepower developed by a Niagara turbine using a specific equation. The user attempts to convert the volumetric flow rate of water into a mass flow rate and applies the formula for horsepower, but questions the accuracy of their conversion factors, particularly the value for acceleration due to gravity. They initially use 9.8 m/s² instead of the appropriate 32 ft/s² for their calculations. Additionally, a suggestion is made to utilize an Excel add-in for unit conversions to streamline the process. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding unit conversions and the correct application of formulas in physics problems.
kriegera
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My teacher assigned a horsepower problem except that we never covered horsepower. Here's my attempt:

One of the Niagara turbines uses 172,000 cubic feet of water per minute under a head of 215 ft. What is the horsepower developed?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The total horsepower developed by water falling from a given height is the product of the mass flow rate in pounds per minute times the falling height in feet divided by 33,000. It can be expressed as:
Php = mmin h g / 33000
where
Php = power (horsepower, hp)
mmin = mass flow rate per minute (lbm/min)
h = head or height (ft)
g = acceleration of gravity (32 ft/s2)

Convert 172,000 cubic feet of water per minute to pounds per minute: A cubic foot of air is approximately 0.0807 lbs  (172,000)(0.0807)=13880.4 lb/minute
Php = (13,880.4)(215)(9.8) / 33000= 8,862.42 hp

-Am I on track here? Also, I used 9.8 for acceleration of gravity-can anyone tell me if this is the value I should be using? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation makes a lot of sense, but I'm not sure about the conversion factors. I don't remember what the 33 000 conversion factor includes but in the SI units:

P = \dot{m}gh

Where the units are:

P --> W
\dot{m} --> kg/s
g --> 9.81 m/s²
h --> m

The mass flow rate is equal to the volumetric flow rate (m³/s) times the density of water (1000 kg/m³), not air.
 
I know, it is super useful to have memorized all the conversion factors. But, once you understand what is happening there are tools that make unit conversion awesome! One of the best ones I've found is the Unit Conversion in Excel (http://www.unitconversionaddin.com ). This simply works because you ( a student like me) are able to do the unit conversion automatically in excel like a program. You don't have to either search on the internet for the conversion value or have to write out some excel function. The download is like 5 bucks and has saved me hours of stress and time. The conversions are really detailed and accurate too, like to 5 decimal places where applicable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top