Solving Linear Copying Problems with Functions: Example using f, g, and h

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsissuef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the composition of linear functions, specifically focusing on the functions f, g, and h defined between different dimensions: f and g from \(\mathbb{R}^3\) to \(\mathbb{R}^2\), and h from \(\mathbb{R}^2\) to \(\mathbb{R}^2\). The original poster seeks to understand how to find the compositions h ∘ f and h ∘ g.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of function composition, particularly h ∘ f, and question the definitions and domains of the functions involved. There is an exploration of the outputs of f and how they serve as inputs for h.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the definitions of the functions and the nature of function composition. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of variable substitution and the dimensionality of the outputs and inputs of the functions.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about potential mistranslations of terms, such as "linear copying" versus "linear map." Additionally, participants are grappling with the constraints of function composition when the output of one function does not match the expected input of another.

Physicsissuef
Messages
908
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let's say that f: \mathbb {R}^3 \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^2, g: \mathbb {R}^3 \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^2, and h: \mathbb {R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^2 are linear copying defined with f(x,y,z)=(y,x+z), g(x,y,z)=(2z,x-y) and h(x,y)=(y,2x). Find the linear copying:

h o f and h o g

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Sorry, but again, I don't know the principle of solving this task. My book is not good at all. Thanks from the start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does h \circ f mean?
What is its domain and co-domain (e.g. what are A and B in h: A \to B)? How is it defined (h(\cdots)= \cdots )?
 
CompuChip said:
What does h \circ f mean?
What is its domain and co-domain (e.g. what are A and B in h: A \to B)? How is it defined (h(\cdots)= \cdots )?

probably h, f, g are the linear copying
 
I don't know what language you translated it from, but I think you mean "linear map" instead of "linear copying".
Also I think you are a little confused as to what h \circ f means. f is a function that takes something in R3 and gives you something in R2. Into h you put something in R2 and get something (else) in R2 back. Now what you can do, is use the output of f as input for h. So
h \circ f: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^2
is a function defined by
(h \circ f)(x, y, z) = h(f(x, y, z)).
So to calculate (h o f)(x, y, z) you first calculate (u, v) = f(x, y, z) and then h(u, v).
Does that clarify ?
 
CompuChip said:
I don't know what language you translated it from, but I think you mean "linear map" instead of "linear copying".
Also I think you are a little confused as to what h \circ f means. f is a function that takes something in R3 and gives you something in R2. Into h you put something in R2 and get something (else) in R2 back. Now what you can do, is use the output of f as input for h. So
h \circ f: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^2
is a function defined by
(h \circ f)(x, y, z) = h(f(x, y, z)).
So to calculate (h o f)(x, y, z) you first calculate (u, v) = f(x, y, z) and then h(u, v).
Does that clarify ?

Yes, sir, that's what it means. Sorry for my mistranslation.
 
CompuChip said:
I don't know what language you translated it from, but I think you mean "linear map" instead of "linear copying".
Also I think you are a little confused as to what h \circ f means. f is a function that takes something in R3 and gives you something in R2. Into h you put something in R2 and get something (else) in R2 back. Now what you can do, is use the output of f as input for h. So
h \circ f: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}^2
is a function defined by
(h \circ f)(x, y, z) = h(f(x, y, z)).
So to calculate (h o f)(x, y, z) you first calculate (u, v) = f(x, y, z) and then h(u, v).
Does that clarify ?

Physicsissuef said:
Yes, sir, that's what it means. Sorry for my mistranslation.

Okay, so do it! If h(u,v)= (v, 2u), and (u,v)= f(x,y,z)= (2z, x- y), what is h\circle f(x,y,z). What is f\circle g(u,v)?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Okay, so do it! If h(u,v)= (v, 2u), and (u,v)= f(x,y,z)= (2z, x- y), what is h\circle f(x,y,z). What is f\circle g(u,v)?

How do you know that (x,y)=f(x,y,z)=(2z,x-y)? I truly don't know what is h \circ f(x,y,z)[/tex] and f \circ g(u,v)
 
Last edited:
Because that was what YOU told us:
physicsissuef said:
f(x,y,z)=(y,x+z)
h\circ f(x,y,z)= h(f(x,y,z))= h(y, x+ z). If h is defined by h(a,b)= (b, 2a), what is h(y, x+z).
 
Can you tell me just this, please, there is one line more, I guess. Thanks.
Probably h(y, x+ z)=(b,2a)
But, what next?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I think you are having some troubles with basic calculus concepts.
Suppose we have a function f(x) = 2 x + 3.
Then can you tell me what are f(3), f(a) and f(y + 1) ?
 
  • #11
f(3)=2*3+3
f(a)=2a + 3
f(y+1)=2(y+1)+3

No, I don't have troubles with basic calculations.
 
  • #12
HallsofIvy said:
If h is defined by h(a,b)= (b, 2a), what is h(y, x+z).

Well, this is exactly the same, but there are just two values to substitute. So
h(y, x + z) is just (b, 2a) with a = y, b = x + z, i.e. h(y, x + z) = (x + z, 2y).
 
  • #13
But it should be h(y, x+z) and (y,2x), so y=y and 2x=x+z. Hmm...
 
  • #14
No, you should have learned long ago that the letters used as variables in defining functions are just "place holders"- you can replace them with anything you want. If f is defined by f(x, y)= 3x+ y then f(a, b)= 3a+ b, f(y, x)= 3y+ b, etc. h\circ f(x,y)= h(f(x,y,z))= h(y, x+z)= (x+ y, 2y) as I said.
 
  • #15
I know that, they are just 'place holders'. But can't understand the whole process.

h \circ f is what we need to find.

(h \circ f)(x,y,z)=h(f(x,y,z))=h(y,x+z)

Now if h(x,y)=(y,2x) then h(y,x+z)=(x+z,2y), right?

I think I understand now. Now for h \circ g is the 2nd think that we need to find.

(h \circ g)(x,y,z)=h(g(x,y,z))=h(2z,x-y)

Now if h(x,y)=(y,2x) then h(2z,x-y)=(x-y,4z), right?

I think, I understand now.
 
  • #16
And if we get f \circ h?

(f \circ h)(x,y)=f(h(x,y))=f(y,2x)

Now if f(x,y,z)=(y,x+z) then f(y,2x)=??

In my book, it says that it is impossible, why?
 
  • #17
What could it be? (y, 2x) is an element of \mathbb{R}^2, whereas f is a function on \mathbb{R}^3. In other words, h produces a pair of numbers, whereas f expects a triple as input. So you cannot plug the output of h into f, in other words: you can't compose them in that order.
 
  • #18
CompuChip said:
What could it be? (y, 2x) is an element of \mathbb{R}^2, whereas f is a function on \mathbb{R}^3. In other words, h produces a pair of numbers, whereas f expects a triple as input. So you cannot plug the output of h into f, in other words: you can't compose them in that order.
Ok, and what for h \circ (f+g) and h \circ f + h \circ g.
First, are they same?
Other thing, how will I solve it?
 
  • #19
Can you write down the definitions of (f + g) and h o (f + g) and (h o f) + (h o g)?
In particular, write down from what space into what space they map, like I did in my last post. Then you can already see if there will be a problem in the composition (like: if the space (f + g) maps to is different than the space h maps from, you cannot compose them, as you have just seen).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K