Solving Linear Equality with Modulus

  • Thread starter Thread starter wanchosen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Modulus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the inequality (2x+3)/(x-5) < |(4x+12)/(x+1)| using modulus. The user successfully derived solutions for both the positive and negative cases of the modulus, yielding critical points at x < (13-SQRT(673))/4 and x > (13+SQRT(673))/4, along with additional solutions involving (1±3SQRT(17))/4. The conversation emphasizes the importance of identifying asymptotes at x = -1 and x = 5, which affect the continuity of the rational functions involved. The method of testing intervals based on critical points is confirmed as a valid approach for solving such inequalities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of solving inequalities involving modulus
  • Familiarity with quadratic equations and their roots
  • Graphing techniques for visualizing function intersections
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of modulus functions in inequalities
  • Learn about asymptotes and their impact on rational function behavior
  • Explore interval testing methods for solving inequalities
  • Investigate advanced techniques for solving quadratic equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in mastering the techniques for solving complex inequalities involving modulus and rational functions.

wanchosen
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to solve the following inequality.

Solve the equation:

(2x+3)/(x-5)<¦(4x+12)/(x+1)¦

(where ¦¦ is meant to be modulus)

I tried to solve this, firstly by using the positive modulus:

(2x+3)/(x-5)<(4x+12)/(x+1)

which gives me two solutions:-

1) x< (13-SQRT(673))/4
and
2) x> ((13+SQRT(673))/4

I then tried to solve

(2x+3)/(x-5)>(-4x-12)/(x+1)

from which I got the following 2 solutions:-

3) (1+3SQRT(17))/4

and

4) (1-3SQRT(17))/4

If I sketch a graph of the equations, I can see that

x < (13-SQRT(673))/4
and
x > (13+SQRT(673))/4

are solutions, and also

(1-3SQRT(17))/4 < x < 5

where there is an asymptote (x = 5) for the LHS linear equation.

My question is have I used the right method in solving this type of inequality, and if so how do I disregard my result for (1+3SQRT(17))/4 and how should I treat the asymptote at x=-1 for the RHS equation.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best way to solve a complicated inequality is to solve the related equation.'

To solve (2x+ 3)/(x- 5)< |(4x+12)/(x+1)|, look at (2x+3)/(x-5)= |(4x+5)/(x+1)|.

If (4x+5)/(x+1) is not negative, we have (2x+ 3)/(x-5)= (4x+5)/(x+1) and multiplying on both sides by (x-5)(x+1), (2x+3)(x+1)= (4x+5)(x-5) or 2x2+ 5x+ 3= 4x2- 15x- 25 which reduces to 2x2- 20x- 22= 0 or x2- 10x- 11= (x+1)(x-11)= 0. These are equal only at x= -1 and 11

The point of that is that "<" can change to ">" only where we have "=" or where the functions are not continuous- which for rational functions means the denominators are 0. Here that happens at x= -3, -3/2, -1, and 5. Those 5 numbers, -3, -3/2, -1, 5, and 11 divide the number line into 6 intervals: x< -3, -3< x< -3/2, -3/2< x< -1, -1< x< 5, 5< x< 11, and x> 11. We can choose one value of x in each interval and evaluate the inequality at that point. Determining that the equality is true (or false) for that point tells us the same is true for all points in that interval.
 
Thanks HallsofIvy,

Your method makes sense. Just to clarify:-

"To solve (2x+ 3)/(x- 5)< |(4x+12)/(x+1)|, look at (2x+3)/(x-5)= |(4x+5)/(x+1)|."

Did you mean "look at (2x+3)/(x-5)= |(4x+12)/(x+1)|"?

I found the first two roots by equating the equations and multiplying both sides by (x-5)(x+1).

I have attached a document which plots the graphs using an online calculator. This shows three intersections. The method above shows the 1st and 3rd intersection points which are

(13-SQRT(673))/4 (approx -3.2355)
and
((13+SQRT(673))/4 (approx 9.7355)

However, using your method how do I obtain the second intersection point which equates to

(1-3SQRT(17))/4 (approx -2.8423)

as the first function dips below the second function at this point again which is between the intervals -3 and -3/2.

Thanks for your help.
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K