Solving Mental Math Questions for Mathematical Methods in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsMark
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around mental math techniques for approximating functions in a mathematical methods in physics course. The original poster presents several problems involving calculations with small numbers and trigonometric functions, expressing uncertainty about how to approach these computations without a calculator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of linear approximations and Taylor series for small values, particularly for sine and cosine functions. The original poster describes a method for approximating fractions but questions its validity. Others suggest using Taylor series expansions for better accuracy and discuss the binomial series for approximating expressions like (1+x)^n.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different mathematical techniques, with some participants providing insights into Taylor series and linear approximations. The original poster expresses confusion about how to apply these concepts effectively, particularly for specific problems. No consensus has been reached, but several lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a desire for a set of rules or tricks for mental calculations, highlighting the challenge of evaluating certain expressions without clear guidance. There is also mention of imposed homework constraints regarding the expected accuracy of the calculations.

PhysicsMark
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am currently taking a mathematical methods in physics course. We were given a prerequisite inventory on the first day of class. There are 4 problems that we are assumed to be able to do in our head to 4 or 5 digit accuracy. I am not sure of how to compute these:

1/.9997
(.9997)^.5
sin(.025)
cos(.025)


Homework Equations


? Perhaps linear approximation? (I can't recall how to use linear approximation)



The Attempt at a Solution



For the first one, using a calculator, I get 1.00030009 as an answer. Playing around with this and other combinations of numbers have led me to find a type of method ( I say type of method because I have no idea if it is valid for all numbers) to evaluate an expression of this kind.

.9997 = 100-99.0003

Bring the numerator into the position right of the decimal (i.e. numerator =1 then 1. or numerator = 2 then 2.). Then bring the .0003 from 99.0003 to the left of the decimal to get 1.0003. This also works for 1/.9996 = 1.0004. When the numerator is something other than 1, I think you have to multiply the 3 in .0003 by the numerator. I.e. 2/.9997 = 2.0006 or 2/.9996 = 2.0008.

Using my calculator and playing around has led me to believe there is a pattern that I am not fully describing here. I also see a relationship with the numbers past 5 digit accuracy. But I am not sure of precisely what it is.

For the other problems, I am lost. Does anyone know any tricks here? If possible I would like an explanation for a set of rules I can apply to the situation.

I have seen on the internet various "tricks" for evaluating large numbers. An example would be multiplying a 5 digit number like 34578*11 in your head. Often, these "tricks" do not fully explain what is going on. They usually give a set of conditions that need to be applied in order to use their method.

Sorry for totally butchering all terminology. Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sin(.025) is about .025. If x is reasonably "small" sin(x) [itex]\approx[/itex] x.

I believe that the basis for the approximations you're being asked to do is linear approximations of functions. Each of the functions you're being asked to approximate has a Taylor series (actually a Maclaurin series for some of these problems) that can be truncated after the first degree term to give reasonable accuracy when x is near zero.

For sin(x), the Maclaurin series is sin(x) = x - x^3/3! + x^5/5! + ...

For cos(x), the Maclaurin series is cos(x) = 1 - x^2/2! + x^4/4! + ..., so for small x, cos(x) is about 1.
 
taylor series: [tex]sin{x} \approx x[/tex]

[tex]cos(x) \approx 1 - \frac{1}{2}x^2[/tex]
 
And we leave it to you to write out the Taylor expansion for (1+x)^n and choose a suitable approximation from it.
 
Thank you for all of the responses. They have provided insight, and I'm thinking differently about these approximations now.

Gokul43201 said:
And we leave it to you to write out the Taylor expansion for (1+x)^n and choose a suitable approximation from it.

I'm assuming you're talking about the problem : (.9997)^.5

Hmm, I'm not seeing how a taylor expansion will help.

The taylor expansion for the form (1+x)^n is(I think):

[tex]f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\a_n(x-c)^n=a_o+a_1(x-c)^1+a_2(x-c)^2...[/tex]

Would that make the problem I'm talking about be :

0+.1(1-.0003)^.1+.2(1-.0003)^.2+...etc?

If that is correct, then I am confused as to how that would help me evaluate (.9997)^.5 because I cannot evaluate (.9997)^.1 or .2 or .3.

I think I am missing something here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K