Solving Simple Limit Problem Without Substitution

  • Thread starter Thread starter es
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
es
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I tutor high school students in Calc and the other day I came across this problem.

Limit of (1-Sqrt(x-2))/(x-3) as x->3

I tried coaching the student on how to simplify the expression and in the end I just showed him this substitution.

Let u=Sqrt(x-2)

Then

(1-Sqrt(x-2))/(x-3) = (1-u)/(u^2-1)

And the Limit becomes

Limit of (1-u)/(u^2-1)=-1/(u+1) as u->1 which is -1/2

He looked at me like I had just done some black magic. I explained substitution to him and why it worked, showed him a couple of other simple examples, and confirmed the answer numerically (like they do in basic calc books when the limit concept is first presented). I still don't think he is 100% convinced because they had not covered this in his class yet which leads to my question.

Can the original problem be solved without substitution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you might do it this way:
[tex]\frac{(1-\sqrt{x-2})}{x-3}=\frac{(1-\sqrt{x-2})}{x-3}*1=\frac{(1-\sqrt{x-2})}{x-3}*\frac{(1+\sqrt{x-2})}{(1+\sqrt{x-2})}=\frac{3-x}{(1+\sqrt{x-2})*(x-3)}=-\frac{1}{(1+\sqrt{x-2})}[/tex]
And so on..
 
Multiplying by the conjugate would do the trick, but personally, I feel the easiest way is L'Hospital's rule .
 
Yipe. For some reason I though 1-x would be the numerator. Boy do I feel sheepish. :) Thanks for the help!