First step of this simple limit problem

  1. First step of this simple "limit" problem

    Lim.............X^3-3x^2+4
    x->2........... X^4-8x^2+16

    In the above "limit" problem i would like to know only the very first important step, the later part of the problem i will manage to solve as its easy, only the first step is a bit tricky

    so what could be the first step of this problem

    actually i am a B.com. student, plz help me thanks in advance
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2009
  2. jcsd
  3. Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    l'hospital's rule applies nicely. if you haven't learned that, then just factor the numerator and denominator.
     
  4. Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    no i haven't learned any l'hospitals rule, but how do i factor the denominator as its x^4

    i want to solve it without that l'hospital method, plz help

    oh i am hearing that l'hospitals rule is easy, i hope i will understand, so if possible u can also explain this rule to solve the first step of this problem or the other
    but atleast something plz
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2009
  5. Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    The denominator factors into (x2 - 4)2, which can be further factored into (x - 2)2(x + 2)2. The numerator can also be factored. Some obvious candidates are (x - 1), (x + 1), (x - 2), (x + 2), (x - 4), and (x + 4).
     
  6. Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    @Mark44

    oh thanks a lot for your help really great

    i will try it on my book and see if i have any difficulty, if yes then i will come back here
     
  7. Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    but one more thing in order to get that (x^2 - 4)^2 have u used your own mind or have u done some rough work
     
  8. HallsofIvy

    HallsofIvy 40,767
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    The fact that Mark44 wrote that in terms of [itex]x^2- 4[/itex] rather than x- 2 implies that he first recognized that [itex]x^4- 8x^2+16= (x^2)^2- 2(4)x^2+ 4^2[/itex] is of the form "[itex]u^2- 2au+ a^2[/itex]", the standard form of a perfect square. I would have done this in a completely different way:

    The only reason you had a problem with that fraction was because both numerator and denominator go to 0 as x goes to 2. That tells you immediately that each polynomial has x- 2 as a factor. Divide the polynomial by x- 2 to find the other factor. Repeat if necessary.
     
  9. Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    I think u should try learning L'Hospital's rule too.....all you have to do then is differentiate the numerator & denominator separately(only in cases: 0/0, ∞/∞, etc.) and then apply the limit.
     
  10. Mentallic

    Mentallic 3,743
    Homework Helper

    Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    Actually I would've gone with a combination of both Mark44's and Hallsofivy's ideas.

    Firstly, looking at the denominator, yes it's a quartic ([itex]x^4[/itex]) but you can treat it as a quadratic in some other variable.

    [tex]x^4-8x^2+16[/tex]

    if you let [itex]x^2=u[/itex] you then have:

    [tex]u^2-8u+16[/tex]

    which is a quadratic. Factoring this gives you:

    [tex](u-4)^2[/tex]

    And then you can substitute [itex]u=x^2[/itex] back and factorize further as Mark44 has done.

    For the numerator it is a cubic, so the above method cannot be used but you can then factor out (x-2) since when you substitute x=2 into it, you end up with 0. This of course means x=2 is a root of the equation.
    After that you'll have a quadratic so it's straight-forward from there :smile:
     
  11. Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    well i understood the problem,thanks everyone a lot

    now i have one more problem for the following simple limit


    lim.........3x(x2-7x+6)
    x->3......(x+2)(x3+4x+3)


    now if u see the above problem and substitute the value of "x" that is "3" then u get the answer as -9/35 therefore the denominator doesn't go to "0" and hence the answer but the text book says the correct answer for this problem is 5/2, looks like we have to simplify the problem is it so, because i had heard that whenever the denominator does NOT go to "0" then we can directly substitute the value of x without simplifying the problem

    so the question is should i directly substitute the value of "x", as the denominator does not go to "0" or i have to simplify it, if yes then why?
     
  12. Mark44

    Staff: Mentor

    Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    Since the denominator doesn't approach 0 as x approaches 3, you can simply substitute 3 in both the numerator and denominator. The value I get is also -9/35. If your book gets a different value, make sure that you are working the same problem as in your book.
     
  13. Re: First step of this simple "limit" problem

    ya thanks a lot
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar discussions for: First step of this simple limit problem
Loading...