Solving the Lie Bracket Question in Quantum Mechanics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bracket Lie bracket
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Lie bracket question in quantum mechanics, specifically the properties of creation and annihilation operators, denoted as a^+ and a. The participants clarify the canonical commutation relation [x,p]=iħ and its implications, particularly the adjoint operation on the Lie bracket [a,a^{\dagger}]. The conclusion reached is that the adjoint of the Lie bracket results in the identity operator, confirming that the identity operator is indeed Hermitian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly operator theory.
  • Familiarity with creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of canonical commutation relations and their significance.
  • Basic grasp of Hermitian operators and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the role of creation and annihilation operators in quantum harmonic oscillators.
  • Explore the implications of canonical commutation relations in quantum field theory.
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of operator adjoints and their applications in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in quantum theory, and researchers interested in operator algebra and its applications in quantum systems.

Marin
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I was doing an assignment in quantum mechanics and came upon the following fact I cannot explain to me.

I hope someone of you can and will be willing to :)


Consider the creation and annihilation operators: a^+ and a and also the momentum and position operators p and x:

[tex]x=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2 c}(a+a^{\dagger})[/tex]
[tex]p=\frac{\hbar c}{\sqrt 2 i}(a-a^{\dagger})[/tex]
[tex]a=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(cx+\frac{i}{c\hbar}p)[/tex]
[tex]a^{\dagger}=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(cx-\frac{i}{c\hbar}p)[/tex]

[tex]c=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}}[/tex]


and the canonical commucator relation: [tex][x,p]=i\hbar 1[/tex], where 1 is the identity operator


It follows immediately from the canonical commutator relation between x and p that

[tex][a,a^{\dagger}]=1}[/tex]
Now, observe what happens when I take the adjoint of this equation:

[tex]([a,a^{\dagger}])^{\dagger}=(aa^{\dagger}-a^{\dagger}a)^{\dagger}=a^{\dagger}a-aa^{\dagger}=-[a,a^{\dagger}]=-1[/tex]

which is peculiar since I thought that the Identity is hermitian: [tex]1^{\dagger}=1[/tex], which apperantly doesn't hold here..

Can anyone tell me why this is so?

thanks in advance,

marin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I found your mistake here
Marin said:
[tex]([a,a^{\dagger}])^{\dagger}=(aa^{\dagger}-a^{\dagger}a)^{\dagger}=a^{\dagger}a-aa^{\dagger}=-[a,a^{\dagger}]=-1[/tex]
marin

Hi Martin,

Using the fact that transposing the product of two operator swaps them and gives the product of their transposes

[tex](A B)^\dagger = B^\dagger A^\dagger[/tex]

we have,

[tex]([a,a^{\dagger}])^{\dagger}=(aa^{\dagger}-a^{\dagger}a)^{\dagger}=a^{\dagger\dagger}a^\dagger - a^\dagger a^{\dagger\dagger} = a a^\dagger - a^\dagger a = 1[/tex]
 
Last edited:
yes, of course!

sorry for asking...

and thanks once again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K