Undergrad Some questions about time and causality in the MWI

Click For Summary
Decoherence in the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) does not contradict the evolution of the wavefunction, as causality is maintained within each world. The wavefunction at any given time is dependent on its previous states, similar to other interpretations of quantum mechanics. The concept of time in MWI is generally viewed as absolute rather than relative across different worlds. Questions about the nature of the wavefunction and its implications for multiple worlds highlight a common confusion in understanding MWI. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the coherence of causality and time evolution within the framework of MWI.
Posy McPostface
Forgive my novice question; but, how does one explain the fact that decoherence doesn't contradict the evolution of the wavefunction in every world? Meaning, how is causality preserved in each world and what concept of time is professed wrt. to each world in the MWI? In other words, it seems like time is absolute and not relative with respect to each world in the MWI and decoherence being able to happen at all. Or am I understanding the wavefunction wrong here, as if it were multiple entities existing in each world and not one dictating the behavior of all worlds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "contradict the evolution of the wavefunction"?
Meaning, how is causality preserved in each world
It does't make much sense to talk about a single world if you want to look at time evolution. Anyway: The same way it is preserved in nearly all interpretations. The wave function at time T depends on the wave function at times t<T only.
Posy McPostface said:
In other words, it seems like time is absolute and not relative with respect to each world in the MWI
What would "relative with respect to each world" mean?
Posy McPostface said:
Or am I understanding the wavefunction wrong here, as if it were multiple entities existing in each world and not one dictating the behavior of all worlds?
I don't understand that question.
 
Nevermind, please disregard.

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
These papers by Pegg et al. (doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.02.003 [section 4]; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230928426_Retrodiction_in_quantum_optics [section 3.2]) seem to show that photon Bell correlations can be inferred using quantum theory in a manner that is compatible with locality by performing quantum retrodiction (i.e. inferring information about the past: e.g. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040586; more papers at end) where they evolve backward from Alice's measured outcome...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
753
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K