Undergrad Spectroscopy: vibronic and rotational transitions

Click For Summary
In spectroscopy, the highest peaks in the absorption spectrum correlate with the most probable energy transitions, specifically the transition from the vibronic level of the fundamental state to the excited state. This is exemplified by the transition v'' = 0 to v' = 2, which corresponds to the highest peak. Each vibrational level contains multiple rotational sublevels, complicating the identification of the most probable rotational transition within the excited state. The Franck-Condon principle, grounded in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, facilitates the separation of electronic and nuclear wave functions, aiding in this analysis. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately interpreting molecular spectroscopy data.
pisluca99
Messages
63
Reaction score
4
IMG_20230525_143940.jpg

IMG_20230525_143958.jpg

In spectroscopy, the highest peaks in the absorption spectrum are those that are associated with the most probable energy transitions in a molecule. The most probable transitions are those in which the best superposition between the wave function of the vibronic level of the fundamental state and the wave function of the vibronic level of the excited state in which the molecule arrives after absorbing radiation occurs: in the image this corresponds to the transition v'' = 0 --> v' = 2, so this transition is associated with the highest peak. However, this is an argument that applies only to vibronic transitions, but each vibrational level in turn has many rotational sublevels (J0, J1, J2, etc.) at which the molecule can arrive. That said, how do you figure out which rotational transition is the most probable, again within the second vibronic level of the excited state?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K