I Spectroscopy: vibronic and rotational transitions

Click For Summary
In spectroscopy, the highest peaks in the absorption spectrum correlate with the most probable energy transitions, specifically the transition from the vibronic level of the fundamental state to the excited state. This is exemplified by the transition v'' = 0 to v' = 2, which corresponds to the highest peak. Each vibrational level contains multiple rotational sublevels, complicating the identification of the most probable rotational transition within the excited state. The Franck-Condon principle, grounded in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, facilitates the separation of electronic and nuclear wave functions, aiding in this analysis. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately interpreting molecular spectroscopy data.
pisluca99
Messages
63
Reaction score
4
IMG_20230525_143940.jpg

IMG_20230525_143958.jpg

In spectroscopy, the highest peaks in the absorption spectrum are those that are associated with the most probable energy transitions in a molecule. The most probable transitions are those in which the best superposition between the wave function of the vibronic level of the fundamental state and the wave function of the vibronic level of the excited state in which the molecule arrives after absorbing radiation occurs: in the image this corresponds to the transition v'' = 0 --> v' = 2, so this transition is associated with the highest peak. However, this is an argument that applies only to vibronic transitions, but each vibrational level in turn has many rotational sublevels (J0, J1, J2, etc.) at which the molecule can arrive. That said, how do you figure out which rotational transition is the most probable, again within the second vibronic level of the excited state?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
First, I need to check that I have the 3 notations correct for an inner product in finite vector spaces over a complex field; v* means: given the isomorphism V to V* then: (a) physicists and others: (u,v)=v*u ; linear in the second argument (b) some mathematicians: (u,v)=u*v; linear in the first argument. (c) bra-ket: <v|u>= (u,v) from (a), so v*u . <v|u> is linear in the second argument. If these are correct, then it would seem that <v|u> being linear in the second...