Spin singlets and the Bell states

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter VantagePoint72
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell Spin States
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of spin singlets and Bell states, specifically focusing on two spin-1/2 particles. The spin singlet state is defined as ##|\Psi^- \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle - |\downarrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle)##, while the Bell state ##|\Phi^+ \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle + |\downarrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle)## exhibits rotational invariance. The discussion highlights that ##|\Psi^- \rangle## uniquely maintains this property, contrasting with ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##, which can be expressed in different bases but does not qualify as a spin singlet. The analysis references Preskill's notes for further validation of these properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly spin-1/2 particles.
  • Familiarity with Clebsch-Gordon series and their application in quantum states.
  • Knowledge of Bell states and their significance in quantum entanglement.
  • Ability to manipulate quantum state representations across different bases.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Clebsch-Gordon series in detail to understand its application in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical properties of Bell states and their implications in quantum information theory.
  • Explore the concept of rotational invariance in quantum states and its significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Review Preskill's lecture notes on quantum mechanics for deeper insights into spin systems and their properties.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the properties of entangled states and their applications in quantum computing.

VantagePoint72
Messages
820
Reaction score
34
Given two spin-1/2 particles, the overall spin of the pair decomposes into a spin singlet and a spin triplet. Using the Clebsch-Gordon series and referring to the z-axis, we find the spin singlet is:

##|\Psi^- \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle - |\downarrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle)##

The overall state is one of the Bell states and is given the standard label. Being a spin singlet is the same thing as being rotationally invariant. However, consider another of the Bell states:

##|\Phi^+ \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle + |\downarrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle)##

This state has an interesting property; it may also be expressed as:

##|\Phi^+ \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_x \uparrow_x \rangle + |\downarrow_x \downarrow_x \rangle)##

or, indeed,

##|\Phi^+ \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_{\hat{n}} \uparrow_{\hat{n}} \rangle + |\downarrow_{\hat{n}} \downarrow_{\hat{n}} \rangle)##

where ##{\hat{n}}## is an arbitrary unit vector. But isn't this property just a mathematical expression of rotational invariance? So how does that square with the fact that it is ##|\Psi^- \rangle## (not ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##) that is the spin singlet for a bipartite system of two spin-1/2 particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's ##|\Psi^- \rangle## that has this property, not ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##. Work it out for the x case and you'll see.
 
I have worked it out for the x case, and the result holds:
##| \uparrow_x \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow_z \rangle + | \downarrow_z \rangle)##
##| \downarrow_x \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow_z \rangle - | \downarrow_z \rangle)##

Hence:
##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow_x \uparrow_x \rangle + | \downarrow_x \downarrow_x \rangle ##
##=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}((| \uparrow_z \rangle + | \downarrow_z \rangle)(| \uparrow_z \rangle + | \downarrow_z \rangle) + (| \uparrow_z \rangle - | \downarrow_z \rangle)(| \uparrow_z \rangle - | \downarrow_z \rangle))##
##=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle + | \downarrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle ##

The general statement is proved (and used extensively by) Preskill in http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/notes/chap2.pdf (p.31)
 
Moreover, this property does not hold for ##|\Psi^- \rangle##, it picks up an overall minus sign. This is irrelevant quantum mechanically; however, it is still odd, given it is supposed to be rotationally invariant. I'm more put off by the behaviour of ##|\Phi^+ \rangle## though, it seems like it shouldn't do this. But, as Preskill shows, it does.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K