Spread fo wavefunctions - filling the universe?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter franoisbelfor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe Wavefunctions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of wavefunctions in the universe, particularly regarding non-interacting particles like cosmic ray protons. It is established that the spread of wavefunctions does not violate the Pauli exclusion principle, as particles that are sufficiently distant can be excluded from anti-symmetrization without significant error. François references Shankar's work, emphasizing that while the wavefunction of an electron extends throughout space, its actual location is probabilistic until measured. The conversation also touches on the implications of these concepts for understanding the universe's expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wavefunctions
  • Familiarity with the Pauli exclusion principle
  • Knowledge of cosmic ray physics
  • Acquaintance with Shankar's quantum mechanics texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of wavefunction spread in quantum mechanics
  • Research the Pauli exclusion principle and its applications
  • Examine cosmic ray interactions and their role in astrophysics
  • Read Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and astrophysicists interested in the behavior of particles in the universe and the foundational principles of quantum theory.

franoisbelfor
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Wavefunctions spread with time, if the particle does not interact.
Now, the universe is filled with particles that do not interact for
thousands and millions of years, for example cosmic ray protons.

This would mean most space in the universe is filled with
wavefunctions, all overlapping.

Does this give problems with the exclusion principle?
Did anybody calculate such effects?
Does this explain the expansion of the universe?


François
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't give any problems with the exclusion principle (thankfully). If the particles are far away, we don't make a big mistake if we don't include them in the anti-symmetrization of the wavefunction. Shankar discusses this I think.
 
the wave function for, say an electron, extends throughout all space. but, this does not mean the electron itself exists everywhere. there's a probability (specifically, the square of the wave function) that when you look, you'll find the electron at a given place. you don't know if it's at a given place or not for sure until you look. you'll never see two electrons on top of each other when you do look, though, due to the exclusion principle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K