Stability of the equilibrium at (0,0)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Akibarika
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Stability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the stability of the equilibrium point at (0,0) for the system defined by the equations x' = y - x^3 and y' = -x^5. The Jacobian matrix calculated is [[-3x^2, 1], [-5x^4, 0]], leading to eigenvalues of zero, indicating that (0,0) is not an isolated fixed point. The trajectory spirals clockwise around the origin, suggesting complex behavior where it may spiral in within certain bounds and out in others. The analysis concludes that linear approximations are insufficient to fully characterize the system's dynamics near the equilibrium point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dynamical systems and equilibrium points
  • Familiarity with Jacobian matrices and eigenvalue analysis
  • Knowledge of stability concepts such as stable and asymptotically stable points
  • Basic calculus, particularly in relation to differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of eigenvalues in dynamical systems, particularly when they are zero
  • Learn about the method of Lyapunov functions for stability analysis
  • Explore the use of phase plane analysis tools like pplane and XPP
  • Investigate higher-order terms in Taylor series expansions for better approximations near equilibrium points
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in dynamical systems analysis, particularly those examining stability and behavior near equilibrium points in nonlinear systems.

Akibarika
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
x'=y-x^3 and y'=-x^5

I've worked the jacobian which is
[-3x^2 1;-5x^4 0] and the equilibrium is at (0,0)
so jac = [0 1;0 0]

and eigenvalues are both 0

so is the stability non isolated point? and what i can say about the basin of attraction of the origin?

Could anyone help me?

thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not an area I know much about, but here goes...

It's fairly clear that the trajectory spirals clockwise around the origin. Question is, does it spiral in or out? Maybe it spirals in within some annulus and out in another.
For |y| >> |x5|, it approximates the ellipse-like curves 3y2+x6 = c. So set f(x,y) = 3y2+x6 and calculate f'. This pretty much settles the overall behavior, I think.
 
haruspex said:
Not an area I know much about, but here goes...

It's fairly clear that the trajectory spirals clockwise around the origin. Question is, does it spiral in or out? Maybe it spirals in within some annulus and out in another.
For |y| >> |x5|, it approximates the ellipse-like curves 3y2+x6 = c. So set f(x,y) = 3y2+x6 and calculate f'. This pretty much settles the overall behavior, I think.

but using the λ^2-τ*λ+Δ=0

if Δ=0 at least one of the eigenvalues is zero. then the origin is not an isolated fixed point. there is either a whole line of fixed points or a plane of fixed points if A=0

Spirals only satisfy τ^2-4*Δ<0.

I don't know how to draw it and pplane and XPP just confuse me.

Thanka a lot
 
Google for the terms "stable" or "asymptotically stable" statioary point. First you have to
understand this terms and then you will find a characterization based on the eigenvalues.
 
Akibarika said:
but using the λ^2-τ*λ+Δ=0
if Δ=0 at least one of the eigenvalues is zero. then the origin is not an isolated fixed point. there is either a whole line of fixed points or a plane of fixed points if A=0
Spirals only satisfy τ^2-4*Δ<0.
As I said, I'm ignorant of the theory - just working from first principles.
dy/dx = -x5/(y-x3). This is zero on the y-axis and infinite elsewhere along y = x3. For y > x3 > 0, it is negative; for y < x3 > 0 positive, etc. This certainly makes it look like spirals.
Now consider f = 3y2+x6. f' = 6yy'+6x5x' = -6yx5 + 6x5y - 6x8 = - 6x8
So f (which is everywhere >= 0) is reducing with time everywhere except on the y-axis. But the trajectory does not stay on the y-axis except at the origin, so if the limit set includes points off the origin it also includes points of the y-axis. Since the value of f constrains those of |x| and |y|, x and y must tend to a limit of 0.
 
The fact that the functions are 0 there mean it is, as you say, an equlibrium- nothing happens there! It is like you were sitting at the top of a hill of bottom of a depression. The fact that the eigenvalues are all 0 means that nothing is happening around the point! It is so flat, in some area around the point, that there no "motion" around the point. Essentially that says that linear approximations (which is what the Jacobean gives you- a linear approximation around the given point) are not enough and you will have to allow higher powers to learn anything about the properties of the system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
759
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K