Standard Deviation (Radialogical Physics Attix)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation and application of standard deviation in the context of Frank Attix's book on Radiological Physics. Participants explore the relationship between standard deviation, expectation value, and variance, particularly in relation to measurements and statistical distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assertion that standard deviation σ equals the square root of the expectation value E, suggesting that standard deviation should be calculated using the formula σ = √[E(x^2) - E(x)^2].
  • Another participant explains the relationship between the variance of the sample mean and the standard deviation, indicating that Var[X_bar] = Var[X]/n, leading to the standard deviation of the mean being σ/√(n).
  • A thought experiment is presented to illustrate confusion regarding the application of the formula, particularly in estimating standard deviation from an average time measurement, suggesting that the standard deviation should align more closely with the precision of the measurements.
  • One participant proposes that the model may be based on a Poisson distribution, where the mean and variance are equal.
  • Another participant expresses understanding after discussing the relationship between Poisson and Gaussian distributions for large n.
  • A later reply emphasizes the need for clarity regarding the stochastic process and the definition of the expectation value in the context of the equation presented by Attix.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the equation σ = √(E) and its implications for standard deviation. There is no consensus on how to interpret or apply this equation, and multiple competing views remain regarding the relationship between standard deviation, expectation value, and variance.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the lack of clarity in defining the stochastic process and the context in which the expectation value is calculated, which may affect the interpretation of the standard deviation.

azaharak
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
In Frank Attix's book on Radialogical Physics

Equation 1.2a reads

σ = √(E) ≈ √(μ) σ= standard deviation of a single random measurement

Where E is the expecation value of a stochastic process which approaches μ (μ is the average of measured values) as the number of measured values becomes vary large (∞)


I agree with the how the mean and expectation value approach each other,
I do not see how the standard deviation is the square root of the expectation value.


Isn't the stdv σ = √[E(x^2)-E(x)^2] = √[E(x-μ)^2]


He continues with the following example:

A detector makes 10 measurements, for each measurement the average number of rays detected (counts) per measurement is 10^5.

He writes that the standard deviation of the mean is √[E(x)/n]≈√[μ/n] = √[(10^5)/10]

where n is the number of measurements.

I agree that the standard deviation of the mean is related to the standard deviation by σ'=σ/√(n), but once again I'm not sure how he gets the standard deviation itself.

Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey azaharak.

The short answer is that you want to calculate Var[X_bar] where X_bar is the sample mean (sum everything up and divide by the number of total samples).

Basically if you do this for a random sample (i.e. you get N samples that are all independent from a fixed population) then the variance can be calculated as Var[X_bar] = (1/n^2)*{Var[X1] + Var[X2] + ... + Var[Xn]} = (n/n^2)Var[X] = Var[X]/n = sigma^2/n.

This means our standard deviation of the estimator of the mean is given by sigma/SQRT(n).

If we know the population variance, we can use this but otherwise we need to use the sample to estimate this and this uses your formula.

There are theoretical reasons why we can do this especially if the estimator for the mean is the sample mean and it happens to be a maximum likelihood estimator (or MLE) and if you are really keen you can look into how this is used in the invariance principle and for finding estimates for transformations of parameters as well as for getting distributions of general estimators.
 
I understand why the standard deviation of the mean is related to the standard deviation by a factor of √(n). I have no issue with this.

What I don't understand is how you can estimate the standard deviation, by taking the square root of the expectation value. That is where my confusion lies.

____

Heres a thought experiment. Assume a normal distributions of times obtained from an experiment where we measure the time it takes something to fall. If the average time for the object to fall is around 0.8 seconds, and my times scatter from each other on the order of .1s

The above forumula would convey that the standard deviation could be taken as sqrt (0.8) , which is going to be larger than 0.8s. The standard deviation should be on the order of the precision (generally speaking).

I can't see how this formula or relation stands true.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure this model is based on a Poisson distribution. In this distribution the mean and the variance are the same.
 
Thank you.. it now makes sense


for large n poisson looks like gaussian.


thanks
 
The equation does look crazy, but we can probably answer the question if you state the claim precisely.

azaharak said:
In Frank Attix's book on Radialogical Physics

Equation 1.2a reads

σ = √(E) ≈ √(μ) σ= standard deviation of a single random measurement

Where E is the expecation value of a stochastic process which approaches μ (μ is the average of measured values) as the number of measured values becomes vary large (∞)

You (or Frank) haven't stated the context of the equation clearly. .

You didn't define the stochastic process. A stochastic process is an indexed collection of random variables. What is the index being used? If the index is k and the random variable is X[k], what does this random variable represent?

What is meant by the "the expectation value" of the process? Over what set of events are you taking an expectation?

Over what set of events are taking an expectation in order compute \sigma? For that matter, what random variable is \sigma supposed to be the standard deviation of?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K