Star Wars Potential: Can Lasers Replace Nuclear Bombs?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using lasers as a substitute for nuclear bombs, specifically in the context of the Star Wars missile defense initiative. It concludes that while lasers can theoretically deliver concentrated energy, practical challenges such as targeting accuracy, laser power output, and beam coherence hinder their effectiveness. The Airborne Laser, a prototype currently under development by Boeing, exemplifies efforts to overcome these obstacles. Richard Garwin's insights on using nuclear energy to power lasers highlight the complexities involved in this technology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of laser technology and its applications
  • Familiarity with missile defense systems, specifically the Star Wars initiative
  • Knowledge of nuclear energy principles and their potential applications
  • Awareness of the Airborne Laser system and its operational challenges
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the technical specifications and capabilities of the Airborne Laser system
  • Investigate the principles of beam coherence and its impact on laser effectiveness
  • Explore advancements in targeting technologies for laser systems
  • Study the theoretical applications of nuclear-powered lasers, including x-ray lasers
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for defense technology researchers, military strategists, and engineers involved in missile defense systems and advanced weaponry development.

sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
Can a system of lasers be built which has the ability to deliver a vast amount of energy on a small spot on Earth making it a possible effective substitute of the nuclear bomb?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Certainly not, unless you could power a laser or energy beam with a nuclear bomb (ie, a focused emp or something like that). A nuclear bomb outputs more energy than everything else on Earth combined at the time it goes off.

In any case, that's not what Star Wars is: its an anti-ballistic missile defense.
 
russ_watters said:
Certainly not, unless you could power a laser or energy beam with a nuclear bomb (ie, a focused emp or something like that). A nuclear bomb outputs more energy than everything else on Earth combined at the time it goes off.
OK.
russ_watters said:
In any case, that's not what Star Wars is: its an anti-ballistic missile defense.

Well, can that be done?
 
sid_galt said:
Well, can that be done?
Yes, a prototype of a daughter technolgoy, the Airborne Laser is being built right now. http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/abl/flash.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
russ_watters said:
Yes, a prototype of a daughter technolgoy, the Airborne Laser is being built right now. http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/abl/flash.html

Thank you. So why isn't it succesful?

Difficulty in targeting? Can't they use a little spread out beam with a higher amplitude so that they don't have to be so accurate with their aim?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sid_galt said:
Thank you. So why isn't it succesful?

Difficulty in targeting? Can't they use a little spread out beam with a higher amplitude so that they don't have to be so accurate with their aim?
So far, it is successful. Do you mean why hasn't it been done before? There are a mountain of technical hurles to overcome (now mostly overcome). Targeting is one, laser power output is another, and beam coherence (when you heat the air it gets turbulent and disperses the beam) is another.
 
russ_watters said:
Certainly not, unless you could power a laser or energy beam with a nuclear bomb
According to Richard Garwin, the SDI's pop-up infrared laser was to be powered by an exploding fission device. This is not to imply that all of the fission energy would be transferred through the laser beam.
 
hitssquad said:
According to Richard Garwin, the SDI's pop-up infrared laser was to be powered by an exploding fission device. This is not to imply that all of the fission energy would be transferred through the laser beam.
I didn't know that. I did know its possible (in theory) to direct the energy from a nuclear bomb - Tom Clancy described a similar phenomena in The Sum of all Fears, where a vaporizing TV dish (in an atomic bomb blast) emitted a focused-emp that knocked out the satellite it was aimed at.

[Google...] A few sites mention a nuclear x-ray laser (I'd heard of the x-ray laser, but not that it was powered by a nuclear weapon), but it doesn't look to me like that ever got off the drawing board. In any case, it seems it was at least possible.
 
russ_watters said:
[Google...] A few sites mention a nuclear x-ray laser
Oops. That seems correct. It must indeed have been an X-ray laser. I read about it 20 years ago in Garwin's The Fallacy of Star Wars and have not brushed up on that issue since then.


Edit: The Union of Concerned Scientists http://www.ucsusa.org/ucs/about/page.cfm?pageID=769 mentions Kurt Gottfried as the "senior author" of The Fallacy of Star Wars, and Amazon.com lists John Tirman as the only author. However, IIRC Garwin said in his recent book Megawatts and Megatons that he was one of the contributors.[/color]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
sid_galt said:
Thank you. So why isn't it succesful?

Difficulty in targeting? Can't they use a little spread out beam with a higher amplitude so that they don't have to be so accurate with their aim?

There have been problems. The biggest one has been getting a laser sufficiently powerful to fit in a small enough space to fit on a 747.
 
  • #11
Its possible but you would have to increase the mass.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Anything is possible. A Boeing 747, Lufthansa AirBus or C-5 Galaxy can be retrofitted by a Fusion Reactor (x1000+ times more powerful compared to other powersource systems).

Like a mobile/portable version of this one http://fusion.gat.com/diii-d/photos/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K