Statistical physics and unfounded arguments

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
Gvido_Anselmi
Messages
31
Reaction score
6
Hello everybody.
I've recently finished work through Weinberg's course in QFT which made my understanding of theoretical physics quite peculiar. For example, I can't understand statistical physics from Landau&Lifshitz book at all as there are a lot of unfounded arguments. I wonder firstly is it a bad sign and secondly is it possible to start study statistical physics from a FT point of view? Can anybody recommend me appropriate books?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I should change "unfounded" by "not sufficiently founded in my opinion".