Sturm-Liouville Separation theorem

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kidsasd987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Separation Theorem
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
Hi, I wonder why wronskian must be constant.

I know that p(x)W[u1(x),u2(x)]=constant, according to the Abel's theorem, but
wouldnt there a special case that W[u1(x),u2(x)]=c/p(x).

Then for this special case, W[u1(x),u2(x)]=/=c and satisfies Abel's theorem.
Is it ok to ignore this special case?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    97.1 KB · Views: 619
this question is incomprehensible to me in connection with the accompanying text.