Superposition States: Is TDSE & TISE Satisfied? Check Here

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    States Superposition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that a general superposition of wavefunctions satisfying the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) also satisfies the TDSE itself. However, this superposition only satisfies the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE) if the energies involved are degenerate, as the TISE functions as an eigenvalue equation. Participants in the discussion validate this understanding, emphasizing the relationship between TDSE and TISE in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE)
  • Knowledge of the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE)
  • Concept of wavefunction superposition
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of eigenvalue equations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of degeneracy in quantum states
  • Learn about wavefunction normalization and its significance
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of TDSE and TISE
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists exploring wavefunction behavior, and educators teaching advanced quantum theory concepts.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi. I just want to check that I understand the following. If I have a general superposition of wavefunctions satisfying the TDSE then that superposition also satisfies the TDSE. But that superposition only satisfies the TISE if the energies are degenerate because the TISE is an eigenvalue equation.
Have I got it right ?
Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
dyn said:
Hi. I just want to check that I understand the following. If I have a general superposition of wavefunctions satisfying the TDSE then that superposition also satisfies the TDSE.
I can assure you are correct and I don't even know what TDSE means.
 
TDSE=time-dependent Schrödinger equation, and the statement in #1 is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dyn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K