Susskind's theoretical minimum

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on questions regarding the transition from the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian in Susskind's theoretical framework. The user seeks clarification on calculating the Hamiltonian from a specific Lagrangian related to a harmonic oscillator, highlighting confusion over the definitions of kinetic and potential energy. Another point of confusion arises from an equation of motion presented as a Lagrangian, prompting questions about its validity. A response suggests a corrected form of the Lagrangian, which can lead to the calculation of canonical momentum. The exchange emphasizes the complexities of understanding these fundamental concepts in theoretical physics.
43arcsec
Messages
37
Reaction score
4
If anyone out there has worked through Susskind's book, I have two questions on the Lagrangian to Hamiltonian section, any help would be greatly appreciated:

1) In Lecture 8 exercise 2, he wants you to calculate take the Lagrangian of

L=1/2ω d/dt q - ω/2 q^2 as a Hamiltonian and says it equals (ω=sqrt(k/m) )

H=ω/2 ( p^2 + q^2)

From what I can tell from his book, the Lagrangian is kinetic energy - potential energy, while the Hamiltonian is kinetic energy plus the potential energy.

I've tried making this work every which way but couldn't come up with it.

Also, on the next page (158) he says the Lagrangian is (d/dt)^2 q = - ω q

This is just the equation of motion for a harmonic oscillator; how does this pass for a Lagragian that is supposed to be the K.E - P.E.?

Sorry if I'm missing something easy, but thanks for taking a look.

-Marc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I think L is maybe given by:

L=1/2ω (d/dt q)^2 - ω/2 q^2

From there, you can begin to calculate p = dL/d(qp) where qp = d/dt q .
Result follows immediately.
 
Canonical momentum, of course. Thanks Maajdl, I am in your debt.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
349
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K