Undergrad Symmetries in quantum mechanics and the change of operators

Click For Summary
In quantum mechanics, symmetry transformations alter the state of a system and the corresponding operators, with the relationship between them expressed as ##|\psi' \rangle = U|\psi \rangle##. The requirement that expectation values remain unchanged leads to the operator transformation ##A' = UAU^{\dagger}##, though some texts like Sakurai present it as ##A' = U^{\dagger}AU##, raising questions about their equivalence. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the role of unitary operators and the distinction between operators and their numerical values. Confusion arises when mixing operator notation with scalar values, emphasizing that operators act on states to yield results that are not themselves operators. Ultimately, understanding these transformations is crucial for grasping the implications of symmetries in quantum systems.
Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
When we make a symmetrie transformation in a quantum system, the state ##|\psi \rangle## change to ## |\psi' \rangle = U|\psi \rangle##, where ##U## is a unitary or antiunitary operator, and the operator ##A## change to ##A'##. If we require that the expections values of operators don't change, we have $$\langle \psi '| A' | \psi ' \rangle= \langle \psi | U^{\dagger}A'U | \psi \rangle =\langle \psi | A | \psi \rangle,$$ what suggest that ##A' = UAU^{\dagger}##. However, in some textbooks, like Sakurai, the change in the operator is ##A' = U^{\dagger}AU##. Why this difference appear? They are equivalent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check to make sure of the definition of ##U##. Are they saying ##|\psi'\rangle = U |\psi\rangle## or ##|\psi\rangle = U |\psi'\rangle##?

In the first case, ##A' = U A U^\dagger##, in the second case, ##A' = U^\dagger A U##
 
Thanks for answering. I think it's the first case. In section 4.3, Sakurai talk about discrete symmetries. The first example is the lattice translation; he considerer a periodic potential ##V## and define the translation operator ##\tau## such that ##\tau (l) |x \rangle = |x + l \rangle ## (##| x \rangle## is a eigenstate of the position operator). So he write $$\tau ^{\dagger}(a) V(x) \tau (a) = V(x + a).$$ But shouldn't it be: ##\tau(a) V(x) \tau ^{\dagger}(a) = V(x + a)##?
 
I think it's confusing to mix up the operator ##\hat{V}## with its value ##V(x)##, which is just a number. So here's the way I would say it:

##\hat{V}## is an operator which acts on position eigenstates as follows:

##\hat{V} |x\rangle = V(x) |x\rangle##

The ##V(x)## on the right side of the equals is just a number, not an operator, so acting on it with ##\tau(a)## or ##\tau^\dagger(a)## would do nothing. Similarly,

##\hat{V} |x+a\rangle = V(x+a) |x+a\rangle##

which is equivalent to:

##\hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle##

Now, act on both sides with ##\tau^\dagger(a)##:

##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = \tau^\dagger(a) V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle##

But remember, on the right-hand side, ##V(x+a)## is just a number, not an operator. So ##\tau^\dagger(a)## commutes with it, to give:

##\tau^\dagger(a) V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) \tau^\dagger(a) \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x) |x\rangle## (since ##\tau^\dagger(a) = (\tau(a))^{-1}##).

So we have:
##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) |x\rangle##

So ##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a)## is the operator which acts on ##|x\rangle## and returns ##V(x+a) |x\rangle##
 
  • Like
Likes Avodyne and Lebnm
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K