Undergrad Taking a partial trace of a multipartite state for measurement

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the role of Positive Operator-Valued Measures (POVMs) in quantum measurement, particularly in multipartite systems. The user describes a scenario involving a system state \(\rho_A\) and a measurement instrument in a pure state \(\rho_B\), leading to a combined state \(\rho_{AB} = \rho_A \otimes \rho_B\). After a unitary interaction and a projective measurement on the instrument, the user seeks to express the resulting state of system A in the form \(M_k \rho_A M_k^\dagger\) using the partial trace over system B. The challenge lies in manipulating the Dirac notation and understanding how to apply the basis elements during the partial trace, especially with the presence of the unitary operator \(U\). The discussion suggests practicing with finite dimensions and Kronecker products for clarity before reverting to bra-ket notation.
beefbrisket
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Seeking help in algebraic manipulation of a partial trace on a multipartite state to get it into the form of operators operating on only one of the subsystems' state.
I am attempting to understand how POVMs fit in with quantum measurement, and I think I am getting tripped up in notation when it comes to multipartite systems. The situation is as follows:

System: \rho_A
Measurement instrument: \rho_B = |\phi\rangle\langle\phi| (pure state)

The multipartite system starts in state \rho_{AB} = \rho_A \otimes \rho_B and to make a measurement the instrument interacts with the system resulting in a state U \rho_{AB} U^\dagger. Then a projective measurement is taken on the instrument only. The operator corresponding to eigenvalue a_k for that would be 1 \otimes |k\rangle\langle k|. Let's assume no degeneracy in eigenvalues.

After the projective measurement (and getting outcome a_k), the total system state would be
\frac{(1 \otimes |k\rangle\langle k|)U \rho_{AB} U^\dagger(1 \otimes |k\rangle\langle k|)}{tr(U \rho_{AB} U^\dagger(1 \otimes |k\rangle\langle k|))}

Focusing on the numerator, I take a partial trace wrt system B to find the state of system A. After doing so, how can I manipulate it into the form M_k \rho_A M_k^\dagger? I think I am getting bogged down in the Dirac notation somehow. I'm unsure how to apply the basis elements with which I am taking the partial trace due to U being there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to note that expressions such as ##\langle k| U|\phi\rangle## are still operators on the system.

To practice, you could temporarily work in finite dimensions and represent the tensor product as a Kronecker product, then ordinary matrix calculus with indices works. At the end, translate your derivation back into bra-ket notation.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K