The action of a particle point is [tex]\int ds = \int d\tau

  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Point
alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
The action of a particle point is \int ds = \int d\tau \sqrt{g_{uv} \dot{x}^u \dot{x}^v} (eq1)

the action of hilbert is \int d^x R \sqrt{g}

eq1 is generalization of einstein hilbert action?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, those two actions are unrelated. The Einstein-Hilbert action is effectively the action only for the metric. Extra terms must be added in the presence of matter (if present).

The action you gave for a point particle is one possibility. At least formally, GR with a point particle could be formulated using the sum of your two actions. In practice, though, there are no solutions to the resulting equations of motion. The point particle action is useful mainly in a test particle regime (where the particle's own effects on the metric are ignored).
 


You have to be carefull what your action describes :)

The Hilbert action describes the gravitational field. But it doesn't describe how particles move in it. The same situation you have with electromagnetic fields; the action of the EM-field alone is given by the usual F^2 term, but if you want to describe how charged particles move in this field, you have to describe coupling.

Your first action describes the idea that particles follow geodesics in spacetime. Notice that the metric appears in it, and the solution of this metric is given by your second action: the Hilbert action.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top