The Clebsch-Gordan Theorem: Proving the Symmetric Spinor Tensors as IRR of SU(2)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sshaep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clebsch-gordan Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Clebsch-Gordan theorem establishes that the tensor product of two irreducible representations (IRR) of SU(2), denoted as {j1} and {j2}, decomposes into a direct sum of representations {j1+j2}, {j1+j2-1}, ..., {|j1-j2|}. The discussion emphasizes the use of symmetric spinor tensors as IRR of SU(2) and suggests that proving the theorem can be approached by symmetrizing the tensor product. The highest weight procedure is highlighted as a method to derive the theorem, utilizing the invariant symbol ε to contract indices between the rank n representation T and the rank m representation S.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Clebsch-Gordan theorem in representation theory
  • Familiarity with symmetric and antisymmetric tensors
  • Knowledge of SU(2) group representations
  • Proficiency in tensor algebra and index notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the highest weight procedure in detail for SU(2) representations
  • Learn about Young tableaux and their application in representation theory
  • Explore the properties of symmetric and antisymmetric tensors in depth
  • Investigate the role of invariant symbols in tensor contractions
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in representation theory, and students studying quantum mechanics or advanced algebraic structures.

sshaep
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Clebsch-Gordan Theorem??

symmetric spinor tensors are IRR of SU(2), i.e., T_{\undergroup{\alpha_1\cdots\alpha_r}}

The Clebsch-Gordan theorem says,

{\{j_1\}}\otimes{\{j_2\}}={\{j_1+j_2\}}\oplus{\{j_1+j_2-1\}}\oplus\cdots\oplus{\{|j_1-j_2|\}}.

Can I prove this theorem by symmetrizing the tensor product,

T_{\alpha_1\cdots\alpha_{2j_1}}\otimes T_{\beta_1\cdots\beta_{2j_2}}=(express sum of fully symmetric tensors) ??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


My suspicion is yes, but it will be hard. Smells like something that you'd do with Young tableaux.

Edit: I think the CG theorem involves both symmetric and antisymmetric tensors. Do you know how to prove the theorem in the usual way (highest weight procedure)?
 


The completely symmetric part of the tensor product will give you the higest spin representation. After that, I would guess you contract indices using the invariant symbol:

\epsilon^{\alpha \beta} = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 &1 \\ -1 & 0 \end{array} \right)

In other words, to couple the rank n representation T with the rank m represenation S, define:

A_{\alpha_1 ... \alpha_{n+m-2}} = \epsilon^{\alpha \beta} T_{\alpha \alpha_1 ... \alpha_{n-1}} S_{\beta \alpha_n ... \alpha_{n+m-2}

B_{\alpha_1 ... \alpha_{n+m-4}} = \epsilon^{\alpha \beta} \epsilon^{\gamma \delta }T_{\alpha \gamma \alpha_1 ... \alpha_{n-2}} S_{\beta \delta \alpha_{n-1} ... \alpha_{n+m-4}

and so on, where you also symmetrize over the \alpha_i.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K