The constants of physics not constant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the nature of constants in physics, specifically angular momentum and isospin. It highlights the commutation relations for angular momentum, represented as [J_i, J_j] = iħε_{ijk}J_k, and for isospin, [t_i, t_j] = igε_{ijk}t_k. The key conclusion is that while ħ is treated as a constant, the coupling constant g can vary due to renormalization group flow, suggesting that ħ cannot be considered a true constant. The cancellation of g and ħ in the context of group theory is emphasized, indicating that the physical coupling does not affect the underlying group structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically angular momentum and isospin.
  • Familiarity with renormalization group flow in quantum field theory.
  • Knowledge of group theory and its application in physics.
  • Basic comprehension of commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of renormalization group flow on coupling constants in quantum field theory.
  • Learn about the role of dimensionless generators in group theory.
  • Explore the mathematical framework of commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the significance of normalization choices in quantum field theory.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of the interplay between constants and group theory in physics.

Jim Kata
Messages
198
Reaction score
10
I'm in a hurry so I'm going to say this quick.

For angular momentum you have

[tex][J_i ,J_j ] = i\hbar \varepsilon _{ijk} J_k[/tex]

and for isospin you have

[tex][t_i,t_j] = ig\varepsilon_{ijk}t_k[/tex]

now, [tex]\hbar[/tex] is viewed as a constant, but [tex]g[/tex] is allowed to change it's value due to renormalization group flow. It seems to me that [tex]\hbar[/tex] can not be a constant then. Where is my reasoning going wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quick answer: the g (and the [itex]\hbar[/itex]) cancels out.

With this choice of normalization for your generators, the isospin group elements are of the form:

[tex]e^{-i\vec{t}\cdot\vec{\theta}/g}[/tex]

So that in the end, the coupling cancels out. This is as it should be, since the group theory doesn't care what the physical coupling is! To see things more clearly, it is better to use a different normalization, where [itex]\vec{t}\rightarrow g\vec{t}[/itex]. Then the g cancels out of your commutator right away, and the group element makes no reference to g at all.
 
Another way to say what I said above is that you usually want your generators to be dimensionless. That is why, for example, we often use the Pauli Matrices and not the actual angular momentum matrices. That way, the group generators are all dimensionless, and when you need the physical angular momentum/isospin/etc, THEN you can add the necessary factors of g and [itex]\hbar[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 163 ·
6
Replies
163
Views
29K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K