The History of String Theory: Debates and Discoveries in the 1960s

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

String theory was first introduced in 1968 by Gabriele Veneziano, who proposed a model that described the strong and weak forces. The theory was further developed by Yoichiro Nambu, Holger Nielsen, and Leonard Susskind in 1970, culminating in the release of superstring theory in 1984 by Michael Green and John Schwarz. Superstring theory posits that matter is composed of one-dimensional quantum strings, existing in a 10-dimensional space, with additional dimensions introduced by David Gross to account for bosons. Despite its advancements, the scientific community has yet to confirm the validity of string theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and fundamental forces
  • Familiarity with string theory concepts and terminology
  • Knowledge of supersymmetry and its implications
  • Basic grasp of dimensional theory in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Gabriele Veneziano's original 1968 paper on string theory
  • Study the contributions of Michael Green and John Schwarz to superstring theory
  • Explore the implications of supersymmetry in unifying fundamental forces
  • Investigate the mathematical framework of extra dimensions in string theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the historical development and scientific implications of string theory.

Tom McCurdy
Messages
1,017
Reaction score
1
I was just trying to remember didn't String theory first come up in like 1968 when it was debated whether someone found something from oilers equations that happened to describe the strong and weak force? Or was that when it was making its first comeback... ah I can't remember.

Just trying to figure out how string theory was started.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tom McCurdy said:
I was just trying to remember didn't String theory first come up in like 1968 when it was debated whether someone found something from oilers equations that happened to describe the strong and weak force? Or was that when it was making its first comeback... ah I can't remember.

Just trying to figure out how string theory was started.

See Gabriele Veneziano (page 136 of Brian Greene's The Elegant Universe) and even Susskind's contribution
 
Last edited:
String theories
Michael Green and John Schwarz continued development of string theory – discovered in 1968 by Gabriele Veneziano and improved on in 1970 by Yoichiro Nambu, Holger Nielsen and Leonard Susskind – and in 1984 they released superstring theory. It suggests that matter is made from incredibly small one-dimensional quantum strings 10^-35 m in length that exist in a 10-dimensional environment – six hidden and four visible to us.
These strings have no mass – like light; they spin, vibrate and rotate, yielding different quantum energy states. Their energy states or harmonics correspond to different fundamental particles within the same family. The extra invisible dimensions can be regarded as mathematical artefacts.
David Gross later added 16 extra dimensions to account for bosons – the transmitters of force. A total of 10 dimensions are needed for fermions, and 26 dimensions are needed for bosons in order to be consistent with quantum theory.
Superstring theory (string theory for short) has incorporated supersymmetry in an attempt to unify the four fundamental forces of nature. But physicists are still a long way from being able to say whether string theory is correct.
 
Tom McCurdy said:
I was just trying to remember didn't String theory first come up in like 1968 when it was debated whether someone found something from oilers equations that happened to describe the strong and weak force? Or was that when it was making its first comeback... ah I can't remember.

Just trying to figure out how string theory was started.

There's a good capsule history of string theory at superstringtheory.com. That site is maintained (slowly!) by Patricia Schwartz, who was (is?) married to John Schwartz one of the key figures in the development of string physics.
 
thank you for your responses
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K