The mysterious underwater pyramid at Yonaguni in Japan

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Yonaguni underwater pyramid, discovered by dive tour operator Kihachiro Aratake in 1985, exhibits features such as right angles, parallel ledges, and steps that challenge the notion of it being a natural formation. Japanese scientists have documented hewn marks on the stones and found tools in the vicinity, supporting the theory of human construction. The ongoing debate includes comparisons to other submerged sites, such as Alexandria and Port Royal, emphasizing the geological activity in the region. The documentary from the History Channel has sparked further interest and skepticism regarding the origins of this monument.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geological formations and processes.
  • Familiarity with underwater archaeology techniques.
  • Knowledge of the tectonic activity in the "Ring of Fire."
  • Awareness of historical submerged sites like Alexandria and Port Royal.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the geological features of the "Ring of Fire" and their implications for underwater structures.
  • Explore underwater archaeology methods used in sites like the Yonaguni pyramid.
  • Investigate the history and findings related to the submerged megalithic site in Cuba.
  • Examine the impact of sea level changes on ancient coastal settlements.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for archaeologists, geologists, historians, and anyone interested in the intersection of natural formations and human-made structures in underwater contexts.

PlasmaSphere
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
This has intrigued me, mainly because a lot of the scientists that go and see it for themselves change their mind and end up thinking that it is not a natural formation. It is an absolutely huge stone monument off the coast of Japan, and it has right angle sides, parrallel ledges, steps, and various other features that are hard to explain by nature.

the history channel did a documentary on it a while ago, an overview of it can be seen here; http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XMMBLNJqw1M#GU5U2spHI_4

http://www.morien-institute.org/yonaguni.html
"The structure was found by dive tour operator Kihachiro Aratake in 1985 and has been a source of controversy ever since. It appears to be a construction made of wide terraces, ramps and large steps. [...]

[...] According to the report, Japanese scientists have documented marks on the stones that indicate that they were hewn. Not only that, the tools used in this process have been found in the area, and carvings have been discovered. A small stairway carved into the rocks appears to render the theory that this is a natural formation implausible."

some good pictures of it can be seen [/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
I would like to see if any other natural rock formations have rocks at such clear cut right angles as this monument has. Some of them seem very precise, and i find it hard to see how they would form to be that precise underwater, water usually makes everything smooth. I can't find any other formations like this one from a quick look around, submerged or not.
 
yup, i really wonder why they keep insisting it's natural... I'm no expert but it really really looks man-made.
 
It looks about as man-made as columnar basalt does at any rate...
 
I think it's difficult to have a conclusive opinion based on the documentary. People have historically shown a predeliction for building settlements on high rock structures and carving the outlying regions to suit, so it might be totally natural, or it might be artificial, or it might be a bit of both.

One thing that I would query in the documentary is their idea that if the rock is artificially shaped, that that stoneworking must date from the Ice Age, when global sea levels were lower.

Coastal cities sometimes sink over comparatively short periods of time, for instance, the archeologically-interesting bits of Alexandria are now under quite a lot of water.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria
Sometimes the sinkage is pretty sudden, e.g. Port Royal
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Royal
... we wouldn't date the underwater remains of Port Royal or Alexandria as going back to the last Ice Age, because we know that isn't true ... they sank due to local geological effects.

Given that the islands that make up Japan run along a faultline between tectonic plates (part of the "Ring of Fire"), and the region is notable for being geologically active (which is why the islands are there!), it seemed a bit odd for the documentary guys to be trying to date any potential human involvement based on mean global sea levels.
 
wow, that's interesting!
 
And then there is also Mega, the Cuban submerged megalithic site, discussed here. It's still there but almost forgotten.