The science of flying molten tungsten

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of molten tungsten potentially flying out of a light bulb during burnout, exploring the feasibility of such an event and the underlying physics. Participants examine the conditions under which tungsten could escape the bulb and the implications of such an occurrence, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recounts a friend's experience of witnessing molten tungsten possibly escaping a light bulb, questioning the validity of this observation.
  • Another participant suggests that if the bulb remained intact, the molten material could have originated from external contacts rather than the filament itself.
  • There is speculation about the possibility of a droplet smaller than the glass thickness penetrating the bulb without leaving a mark, though this is met with skepticism.
  • Concerns are raised about the amount of tungsten present in a bulb, with some arguing that it is insufficient for a typical droplet size.
  • One participant proposes that the size of any droplets could be influenced by the fragmentation of the filament during burnout, suggesting a complex interplay of physical factors.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of energy requirements for a hot sphere to pass through a material, comparing it to melting a column of the same material, highlighting interest in the physics of such interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the likelihood of molten tungsten escaping the bulb. While some support the idea that external factors could account for the observed phenomenon, others remain skeptical and believe the explanation is unlikely. No consensus is reached regarding the validity of the original observation.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of the physical processes involved, including assumptions about the behavior of molten materials and the specific conditions during bulb burnout. The discussion reflects a range of hypotheses without definitive conclusions.

MathYew
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

a friend of mine - a college physics professor, and me, have had a discussion about an experience he had in his early school days, and we haven't been able to prove or dissprove what he thinks he saw.
During an incandescent light burn-out (12V bulb on 220V =), he thinks he might have seen a drop of molten bulb wire (tungsten) fly (or melt its way) right throug the glass bulb housing and on to the floor, leaving the bulb intact. (but not the parquet :)
My gut feeling is, that what he saw, probably came from the outside of the bulb, but frankly, neither of us is able to make any foolproof physical calculations to rule out the "penetration hypothesis". :)

What's your oppinion on this?

bye
Matej
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easy. If the bulb remained intact, then, apart from interieur damage with high current, there was an external one - on the bulb contacts. They also may melt and give droplets of flying metal. I do not recommend doing this. Any short-cut may produce unpredictable dammage.
 
I agree, but his explanation at the moment is that the droplet, smaler than the thickness of the glass, might have made it's way through, sealing the hole behind it and not leaving a noticeable mark. (He didn't investigate thoroughly...)
Sounds incredible to me, but it'd be fascinating if it was true, don't you think?
 
Last edited:
MathYew said:
it'd be fascinating if it was true, don't you think?

Yes, it would, but I really don't think that it happened. I believe that Bob is correct. On almost any bulb that I've seen there's a small deposit of solder at the top of the metal section right where the glass goes in. It connects the 'ground' side of the filament to the case, and could easily melt under such overload conditions.
 
There's also much, much less tungsten in a lightbulb than a typical drop.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
There's also much, much less tungsten in a lightbulb than a typical drop.

That doesn't have to be a problem - if the tungsten wire breaks small piece can drop out - it doesn't have to be a "drop" size.
 
I just thought of another clue, which I think disproves the possibility that the spark came from the inside of the bulb... As my college put it, it flew out in an arc. Glass even if it was molten, would still be quite viscous and so, would probably stop the droplet completely.
Well whatever. I think my colleague is a good professor and a good physicist... in his field... :) Had he given this thing any thought, he'd realize, his conclusion was probably false. But I'm not the one to say...
 
Well, I was thinking "drop size" was related to visibility. But now that I think of it, there's probably some complicated interplay between weight and surface tension that determines how big a drop is. It would be interesting to compare the amount of tungsten and the minimum drop size.
 
I think the sizes of drops in this case would be at least partially determined by the fragmentation of the filament during the "burning-out" and would probably depend on the weak spots in material - thicknes and local resistivity. But also on a thousand of other more kinetic factors, I think. But what fascinates me personally is the physics of "melting - through" a layer of matrial. How much less (I suppose) energy is required for a hot sphere to pass through ice in comparison with the energy required to melt a column of ice of the same height and radius... for example. Some frighteningly concrete physics. =)