The worst written science article I've ever seen a journalist produce

  • Thread starter Lyuokdea
  • Start date
The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

I'm just appalled, I don't even know what to say....I don't think this is even in a blog, it appears to actually be an article by fox news (and it came up on their main page)

I guess a second issue is....what do you do against such blatantly horrible journalism, and how do you respond to it?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,483477,00.html

Still worried that the Large Hadron Collider will create a black hole that will destroy the Earth when it's finally switched on this summer?

Um, well, you may have a point.

Three physicists have reexamined the math surrounding the creation of microscopic black holes in the Switzerland-based LHC, the world's largest particle collider, and determined that they won't simply evaporate in a millisecond as had previously been predicted.

Rather, Roberto Casadio of the University of Bologna in Italy and Sergio Fabi and Benjamin Harms of the University of Alabama say mini black holes could exist for much longer — perhaps even more than a second, a relative eternity in particle colliders, where most objects decay much faster.
~Lyuokdea
 
Last edited by a moderator:

turbo

Gold Member
3,027
44
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

If the worst comes to pass, and there's now a slightly greater chance that it might, at least it might explain why we've never heard from extraterrestrial civilizations: Maybe they built Large Hadron Colliders of their own.

~Lyuokdea
And destroyed the universe?... Wait! we're still here for now (we'll have to keep checking, I guess).
 
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

Please use the
 
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

And destroyed the universe?... Wait! we're still here for now (we'll have to keep checking, I guess).
A black hole would not destroy the universe, just their planet, and, depending on conditions, their solar system.
 
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

I guess that is why they call it faux news!
 
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

This is old news, the chances of it creating a black hole are small, and even if it does they will by so minute as to have relatively little effect (I made a joke there, did you see?) :wink:

Silly journalists. Same thing happened when they produced anti-hydrogen. :rolleyes:
 
2,904
13
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

Fair & Balanced

Q.E.D
 

Chi Meson

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,766
10
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

Fair & Balanced
pronounced: "fairly imbalanced"
 
3,074
3
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

The atom bomb supposedly would have had created a chain reaction, turning our planet into a inferno.
 

Mk

1,963
3
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

I'm just appalled, I don't even know what to say....I don't think this is even in a blog, it appears to actually be an article by fox news (and it came up on their main page)

I guess a second issue is....what do you do against such blatantly horrible journalism, and how do you respond to it?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,483477,00.html
Still worried that the Large Hadron Collider will create a black hole that will destroy the Earth when it's finally switched on this summer?

Um, well, you may have a point.

Three physicists have reexamined the math surrounding the creation of microscopic black holes in the Switzerland-based LHC, the world's largest particle collider, and determined that they won't simply evaporate in a millisecond as had previously been predicted.

Rather, Roberto Casadio of the University of Bologna in Italy and Sergio Fabi and Benjamin Harms of the University of Alabama say mini black holes could exist for much longer — perhaps even more than a second, a relative eternity in particle colliders, where most objects decay much faster.
~Lyuokdea
I don't understand how this is the worst written "article" you've ever seen. It is a bit tongue-in-cheek, yes, but the article is likely reporting on a few research articles that came out this week regarding miscalculations in CERN's risk investigation.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.2948
http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.5515
 
Last edited by a moderator:
107
0
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

Oh those scientists, never knowing whats right and whats wrong.

Faux News said:
We're also wondering how often the LHC might create individual black holes, since longer-lived ones have a greater chance of merging with each other, and, um, well, see ya.
 
17
0
Re: The worst written science "article" I've ever seen a journalist produce

Until they have a binoculars to see people in real time, they will always confuse and get confused. :biggrin:
 

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top